Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356953›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2018

A step-wise community engagement and capacity building model prior to implementation of mhGAP-IG in a low- and middle-income country: a case study of Makueni County, Kenya.

Victoria N Mutiso, Isaiah Gitonga, Abednego Musau, Christine W Musyimi, Eric Nandoya, Tahilia J Rebello, Kathleen M Pike, David M Ndetei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Moving away from the scarcity fallacy: three strategies to reduce the mental health treatment gap in LMICs.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Victoria N MutisoAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Off Elgon Road, Mawensi Gardens, Nairobi, Kenya.
Isaiah GitongaAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Off Elgon Road, Mawensi Gardens, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abednego MusauAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Off Elgon Road, Mawensi Gardens, Nairobi, Kenya.
Christine W MusyimiAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Off Elgon Road, Mawensi Gardens, Nairobi, Kenya.
Eric NandoyaAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Off Elgon Road, Mawensi Gardens, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tahilia J Rebello2Global Mental Health Program, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Kathleen M Pike2Global Mental Health Program, Columbia University, New York, USA.
David M NdeteiAfrica Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Matumbato Road, Off Elgon Road, Mawensi Gardens, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization developed the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) as guidelines for innovative utilization of available resources in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in order to accelerate the reduction of the mental health treatment gap. The mhGAP-IG calls for each country to contextualize the guide to their social, cultural and economic context. The objective of this paper is to describe a model for a stepwise approach for implementation of mhGAP-IG in a rural Kenyan setting using existing formal and informal community resources and health systems.

methodsWe conducted an analysis of mental health services in Makueni County, one of the 47 counties in Kenya, in order to understand the existing gaps and opportunities in a low-resource setting. We conducted stakeholder analysis and engagement through interactive dialogue in order for them to appreciate the importance of mental health to their communities. Through the process of participatory Theory of Change, the stakeholders gave their input on the process between the initiation and the end of the process for community mental health development, with the aim of achieving buy-in and collective ownership of the whole process. We adapted the mhGAP-IG to the local context and trained local human resources in skills necessary for the implementation of mhGAP-IG and for monitoring and evaluating the process using instruments with good psychometric properties that have been used in LMICs.

resultsWe were able to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing the mhGAP-IG using existing and trained community human resources using a multi-stakeholder approach. We further demonstrated the feasibility to transit seamlessly from research to policy and practice uptake using our approach.

conclusionsAn inclusive model for low resource settings is feasible and has the potential to bridge the gap between research, policy and practice. A major limitation of our study is that we did not engage a health economist from the beginning in order to determine the cost-effectiveness of our proposed model, occasioned by lack of resources to hire a suitable one.

Indexed as

CommunityImplementationKenyaMental healthmhGAP-IGStakeholders

Identifiers

PMID30356953
PMCPMC6191998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.