Trial reportChiropractic & manual therapies2018
Degenerative findings on MRI of the cervical spine: an inter- and intra-rater reliability study.
Trial report in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-resolution visualization of cervical spine anatomy using 3D DESS at 7-T MRI: a cohort study in asymptomatic volunteers.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Assessing cervical intervertebral disc height on MRI and X-ray versus CT; a single center retrospective cohort study.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Double trouble - identifying rating inconsistencies due to double ratings of the "Show backbone" study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Feasibility of fully automatic assessment of cervical canal stenosis using MRI via deep learning.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Association Between Cumulative G-force Exposure and Cervical Spine Degenerative Changes.Military medicine · 2025Article
- MRI-Based Diagnosis of Neurocysticercosis with Coexisting Cervical and Lumbar Disc Pathology: A Case Report.Acta medica Lituanica · 2025Article
- Degenerative cervical spine changes among early career fighter pilots: a 5-year follow-up.BMJ military health · 2023Article
- Reliability of reporting differences in degenerative MRI findings of the lumbar spine from the supine to the upright position.Skeletal radiology · 2022Article
- The Role of Cervical Muscles Morphology in the Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease: Clinical Correlations Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2021Review
- Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three raters.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2020Article
- Prediction of 2-year work participation in sickness absentees with neck or shoulder pain: the contribution of demographic, patient-reported, clinical and imaging information.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knowledge about the assessment reliability of common cervical spine changes is a prerequisite for precise and consistent communication about Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of degenerative findings when assessing cervical spine MRI. Methods: Fifty cervical spine MRIs from subjects with neck pain were used. A radiologist, a chiropractor and a second-year resident of rheumatology independently assessed kyphosis, disc height, disc contour, vertebral endplate signal changes, spinal canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and osteoarthritis of the uncovertebral and zygapophyseal joints. An evaluation manual was composed containing classifications and illustrative examples, and ten of the MRIs were evaluated twice followed by consensus meetings to refine the classifications. Next, the three readers independently assessed the full sample. Reliability measures were reported using prevalence estimates and unweighted kappa (Κ) statistics. Results: The overall inter-rater reliability was substantial (Κ ≥ 0.61) for the majority of variables and moderate only for zygapophyseal osteoarthritis (Κ = 0.56). Intra-rater reliability estimates were higher for all findings. Conclusions: The present classifications for some of the most common cervical degenerative findings yielded mainly substantial inter-rater reliability estimates and substantial to almost perfect intra-rater reliability estimates. . Trial registration: Regional Data Protection Agency (J.no. 1-16-02-86-16). The letter of exemption from the Regional Ethical Committee is available from the author on request (case no. 86 / 2017).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.