Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356843›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Accounting for Bacterial Overlap Between Raw Water Communities and Contaminating Sources Improves the Accuracy of Signature-Based Microbial Source Tracking.

Moa Hägglund, Stina Bäckman, Anna Macellaro, Petter Lindgren, Emmy Borgmästars, Karin Jacobsson, Rikard Dryselius, Per Stenberg, Andreas Sjödin, Mats Forsman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Moa HägglundDivision of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden.
Stina BäckmanDivision of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden.
Anna MacellaroDivision of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden.
Petter LindgrenDivision of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden.
Emmy BorgmästarsSurgery Section, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Karin JacobssonNational Food Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rikard DryseliusNational Food Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Per StenbergDivision of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden.
Andreas SjödinDivision of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden.
Mats ForsmanDivision of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden.
Jon AhlinderDivision of CBRN Security and Defence, FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umeå, Sweden.
Swedish Defence Research Agency · SEUmeå University · SENational Food Administration · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial source tracking (MST) analysis is essential to identifying and mitigating the fecal pollution of water resources. The signature-based MST method uses a library of sequences to identify contaminants based on operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that are unique to a certain source. However, no clear guidelines for how to incorporate OTU overlap or natural variation in the raw water bacterial community into MST analyses exist. We investigated how the inclusion of bacterial overlap between sources in the library affects source prediction accuracy. To achieve this, large-scale sampling - including feces from seven species, raw sewage, and raw water samples from water treatment plants - was followed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. The MST library was defined using three settings: (i) no raw water communities represented; (ii) raw water communities selected through clustering analysis; and (iii) local water communities collected across consecutive years. The results suggest that incorporating either the local background or representative bacterial composition improves MST analyses, as the results were positively correlated to measured levels of fecal indicator bacteria and the accuracy at which OTUs were assigned to the correct contamination source increased fourfold. Using the proportion of OTUs with high source origin probability, underpinning a contaminating signal, is a solid foundation in a framework for further deciphering and comparing contaminating signals derived in signature-based MST approaches. In conclusion, incorporating background bacterial composition of water in MST can improve mitigation efforts for minimizing the spread of pathogenic and antibiotic resistant bacteria into essential freshwater resources.

Indexed as

16S rRNA ampliconbacterial community analysisfecal contaminationmicrobial community profilingmicrobial source tracking

Identifiers

PMID30356843
PMCPMC6190859
OpenAlexW2895608879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.