Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356823›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2018

Completeness of patient-held records: observations of the Road-to-Health Booklet from two national facility-based surveys at 6 weeks postpartum, South Africa.

Trisha Ramraj, Ameena E Goga, Anna Larsen, Vundli Ramokolo, Sanjana Bhardwaj, Witness Chirinda, Debra Jackson, Duduzile Nsibande, Kassahun Ayalew, Yogan Pillay and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An audit of completeness of Road to Health Booklet at a community health centre in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Trisha RamrajHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ameena E GogaHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Anna LarsenUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Global Health, Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Pretoria, South Africa.
Vundli RamokoloHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sanjana BhardwajUNICEF, Pretoria, South Africa.
Witness ChirindaHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Debra JacksonSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Duduzile NsibandeHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kassahun AyalewUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Global Health, Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Pretoria, South Africa.
Yogan PillayNational Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa.
Carl J LombardBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nobubelo K NganduHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
South Africa PMTCT Evaluation (SAPMCTE) Team

Funding

NCHHSTP CDC HHS U2G PS001137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuity of care is important for child well-being in all settings where postnatal retention of mother-infant pairs in care remains a challenge. This analysis reports on completeness of patient-held infant Road to Health Booklets (RtHBs), amongst HIV exposed and unexposed infants during the first two years after the RtHB was launched country-wide in South Africa.

methodsSecondary data were analysed from two nationally representative, cross-sectional surveys, conducted in 2011-12 and 2012-13. These surveys aimed to measure early effectiveness of the national programme for preventing vertical HIV transmission. Participants were eligible for this analysis if they were 4-8 weeks old, receiving their six-week immunisation, not needing emergency care and had their RtHBs reviewed. Caregivers were interviewed and data abstracted from RtHBs. RtHB completeness across both surveys was defined as the proportion of RtHBs with any of the following indicators recorded: infant birth weight, BCG immunisation, maternal syphilis results and maternal HIV status. A partial proportional odds logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with completeness. Survey sampling weights were included in all analyses.

resultsData from 10 415 (99.6%) participants in 2011-12 and 9529 (99.2%) in 2012-13 were analysed. Overall, recording of all four indicators increased from 23.1% (95% confidence interval (CI)  = 22.2-24.0) in 2011-12 to 43.3% (95% CI = 42.3-44.4) in 2012-13. In multivariable models, expected RtHB completeness (ie, recording all four indicators vs recording of <4 indicators), was significantly (

conclusionsRoutine patient-held infant health RtHB, a critical tool for continuity of care in high HIV/TB prevalence settings, was poorly completed, with less than 50% of the RtHB showing expected completeness. However, government efforts for improved usage of the booklet were evidenced by the near doubling of completeness from 2011 to 2013. Education about its importance and interventions aiming at optimising its use without violating user privacy should be continued.

Indexed as

PamphletsPostnatal CareAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMedical RecordsMiddle AgedObservationProgram EvaluationSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID30356823
PMCPMC6189547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.