Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356632›Full record

ReviewJournal of sport and health science2017

Time for a paradigm shift in the classification of muscle injuries.

Bruce Hamilton, Juan-Manuel Alonso, Thomas M Best

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of sport and health science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07566039 (Prospective Cohort Study of Athletes Following an Injection of Platelet-Poor Plasma Into an Acute Muscle Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07566039 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Cohort Study of Athletes Following an Injection of Platelet-Poor Plasma Into an Acute Muscle Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2026 to 2030Enrolled90ConditionsLower Extremity InjuryArmsPlatelet Poor Plasma (PPP) Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. СHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  5. Traumatic muscle injury.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  6. Imaging of common hip pathologies in runners.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Musculoskeletal Disorders' Classification Proposal for Application in Occupational Medicine.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Programmed death-1 promotes contused skeletal muscle regeneration by regulating Treg cells and macrophages.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exercise and Muscle Atrophy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bruce HamiltonHigh Performance Sport New Zealand, Millennium Institute of Sport and Health, Mairangi Bay, Auckland 0110, New Zealand.
Juan-Manuel AlonsoSports Medicine Department, Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha 22922, Qatar.
Thomas M BestUHealth Sports Medicine Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle injuries remain one of the most common injuries in sport, yet despite this, there is little consensus on how to either effectively describe or determine the prognosis of a specific muscle injury. Numerous approaches to muscle classification and grading of medicine have been applied over the last century, but over the last decade the limitations of historic approaches have been recognized. As a consequence, in the past 10 years, clinical research groups have begun to question the historic approaches and reconsider the way muscle injuries are classified and described. Using a narrative approach, this manuscript describes several of the most recent attempts to classify and grade muscle injuries and highlights the relative strengths and weaknesses of each system. While each of the new classification and grading systems have strengths, there remains little consensus on a system that is both comprehensive and evidence based. Few of the currently identified features within the grading systems have relevance to accurately determining prognosis.

Indexed as

ClassificationGradingMagnetic resonance imagingMuscle injuryReturn to playUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID30356632
PMCPMC6189241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.