Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356342›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling.

Juan Liu, Elise Bardawil, Robert K Zurawin, Junwei Wu, Huaying Fu, Francisco Orejuela, Xiaoming Guan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05969067 (Comparing Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05969067 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsPelvic Organ ProlapseArmsTunneling Technique during RA SCP, Dissection Technique during RA SCP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan LiuSection of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.
Elise BardawilSection of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.
Robert K ZurawinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Junwei WuGuangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Shi, China.
Huaying FuGuangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Shi, China.
Francisco OrejuelaDivision of Urogynecology.
Xiaoming GuanSection of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) suture and a retroperitoneal tunneling technique performed by a single surgeon, combined with a literature review. Patient demographic information and perioperative data were analyzed. The standard robotic sacrocolpopexy steps were followed, but the surgeon used a combined technique of V-Loc suture and retroperitoneal tunneling to simplify the procedure. No additional ports were necessary in any of the patients. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scoring method, the mean preoperative C-point of the 15 patients was +1.16 compared to the mean immediate postoperative C-point, which was -5.5. The mean total sacrocolpopexy time was 74.7 (range, 50-99) minutes and mean mesh anchoring time was 22.60 ± 3.85 minutes. The mean sacral promontory fixation and tunneling and mesh position times were 11.87 ± 3.02 and 5.80 ± 2.14 minutes, respectively. All 15 cases were performed without perioperative or long-term complications. DISCUSSION: R-LESS in combination with the V-Loc suture and the retroperitoneal tunneling technique can be safely and feasibly performed, especially in sacrocolpopexy and, potentially, in other POP surgeries. With adequate and systematic training, surgeons can acquire the necessary skills to perform this complex surgical procedure.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapseRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresSacrumSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomePelvic organ prolapseRetroperitoneal tunneling techniqueRobotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS)SacrocolpopexyV-Loc suture

Identifiers

PMID30356342
PMCPMC6169819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.