Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356270›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Information and order of information effects on consumers' acceptance and valuation for genetically modified edamame soybean.

Ji Yong Lee, Michael P Popp, Elijah J Wolfe, Rodolfo M Nayga, Jennie S Popp, Pengyin Chen, Han-Seok Seo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ji Yong LeeDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7836-9831
Michael P PoppDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Elijah J WolfeDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Rodolfo M NaygaDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Jennie S PoppDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Pengyin ChenDivision of Plant Science, University of Missouri - Delta Center, Portageville, Missouri, United States of America.
Han-Seok SeoDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-8199
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USDelta Air Lines (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines two different strategies with respect to managing the order in which information about genetically modified (GM) technology would reach and impact consumers of edamame, often referred to as the "vegetable soybean". Edamame are soybeans harvested while the beans are young and soft. We capture consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for unlabeled edamame, non-GM edamame, and GM edamame using a non-hypothetical random nth price auction. We elicit consumers' valuation for each edamame product before and after introducing information, and test two strategies where the order of providing positive and negative information is reversed. The results suggest that negative information affects WTP to a much greater extent than positive information. Hence a strategy to proactively deal with eventual negative press about GM technology did not lead to a different result than a strategy that would react to or attempt to thwart negative information with positive information at a later date. These findings suggest that it would be difficult to introduce new GM edamame as edible products in the market as marginally negative preconceptions about GM at the time of the experiment were easier to reinforce with negative information than to combat with positive information about GM.

Indexed as

Food LabelingGlycine maxPublic OpinionCosts and Cost AnalysisFood, Genetically ModifiedHumans

Identifiers

PMID30356270
PMCPMC6200256
OpenAlexW2898427744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.