Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356267›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Viridot: An automated virus plaque (immunofocus) counter for the measurement of serological neutralizing responses with application to dengue virus.

Leah C Katzelnick, Ana Coello Escoto, Benjamin D McElvany, Christian Chávez, Henrik Salje, Wensheng Luo, Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer, Richard Jarman, Anna P Durbin, Sean A Diehl and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Automated Counting of Chikungunya Virus-Formed Plaques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Leah C KatzelnickDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1033-6758
Ana Coello EscotoDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9634-5091
Benjamin D McElvanyDepartment of Medicine-Infectious Disease, Vaccine Testing Center, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0226-7222
Christian ChávezDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Henrik SaljeMathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Wensheng LuoCenter for Immunization Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Isabel Rodriguez-BarraquerDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Richard JarmanViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Anna P DurbinCenter for Immunization Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sean A DiehlDepartment of Medicine-Infectious Disease, Vaccine Testing Center, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9700-235X
Derek J SmithDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Stephen S WhiteheadNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Derek A T CummingsDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

Using Dengue Controlled Human Infection Model to Identify Adaptive Immune Correlates of ProtectionP20GM125498 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI Kristen Pierce · 2018 to 2026
$24.9M
Laboratory And Preclinical Studies Of FlavivirusesZIAAI000891 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI WHITEHEAD, STEPHEN · 2009 to 2025
$17.5M
VERMONT IMMUNOBIOLOIGY/ INFECTIOUS DISEASES CENTERP20RR021905 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HILL, JACK · 2006 to 2011
$14.5M
Vermont Immunology/Infectious Diseases CenterP30GM118228 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BUDD, RALPH C · 2016 to 2021
$6.8M
LINKING ANTIGENIC & GENETIC VARIATION OF DENGUE TO INDIVIDUAL AND POPULATION RISKR01AI114703 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CUMMINGS, DEREK A · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR021905NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114703NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125498NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM118228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold-standard method for quantifying neutralizing antibody responses to many viruses, including dengue virus (DENV), is the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT, also called the immunofocus reduction neutralization test). The PRNT conducted on 96-well plates is high-throughput and requires a smaller volume of antiserum than on 6- or 24-well plates, but manual plaque counting is challenging and existing automated plaque counters are expensive or difficult to optimize. We have developed Viridot (Viridot package), a program for R with a user interface in shiny, that counts viral plaques of a variety of phenotypes, estimates neutralizing antibody titers, and performs other calculations of use to virologists. The Viridot plaque counter includes an automatic parameter identification mode (misses <10 plaques/well for 87% of diverse DENV strains [n = 1521]) and a mode that allows the user to fine-tune the parameters used for counting plaques. We compared standardized manual and Viridot plaque counting methods applied to the same wells by two analyses and found that Viridot plaque counts were as similar to the same analyst's manual count (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, ρc = 0.99 [95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00]) as manual counts between analysts (ρc = 0.99 [95% CI: 0.98-0.99]). The average ratio of neutralizing antibody titers based on manual counted plaques to Viridot counted plaques was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98-1.14), similar to the average ratio of antibody titers based on manual plaque counts by the two analysts (1.06 [95% CI: 0.84-1.34]). Across diverse DENV and ZIKV strains (n = 14), manual and Viridot plaque counts were mostly consistent (range of ρc = 0.74 to 1.00) and the average ratio of antibody titers based on manual and Viridot counted plaques was close to 1 (0.94 [0.86-1.02]). Thus, Viridot can be used for plaque counting and neutralizing antibody titer estimation of diverse DENV strains and potentially other viruses on 96-well plates as well as for formalization of plaque-counting rules for standardization across experiments and analysts.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAutomation, LaboratoryDengue VirusHumansNeutralization TestsViral Plaque AssayZika VirusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID30356267
PMCPMC6226209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.