Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356240›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Identification of a novel nidovirus as a potential cause of large scale mortalities in the endangered Bellinger River snapping turtle (Myuchelys georgesi).

Jing Zhang, Deborah S Finlaison, Melinda J Frost, Sarah Gestier, Xingnian Gu, Jane Hall, Cheryl Jenkins, Kate Parrish, Andrew J Read, Mukesh Srivastava and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolutionarily divergent nidovirus with an exceptionally large genome identified in Pacific oysters undergoing mass mortality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Nidoviruses in Reptiles: A Review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jing ZhangVirology Laboratory, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.
Deborah S FinlaisonVirology Laboratory, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.
Melinda J FrostVirology Laboratory, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah GestierVirology Laboratory, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.
Xingnian GuVirology Laboratory, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.
Jane HallAustralian Registry of Wildlife Health, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Bradleys Head Road, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia.
Cheryl JenkinsMicrobiology and Parasitology, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.
Kate ParrishVirology Laboratory, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew J ReadVirology Laboratory, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2421-4287
Mukesh SrivastavaVirology Laboratory, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.
Karrie RoseAustralian Registry of Wildlife Health, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Bradleys Head Road, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter D KirklandVirology Laboratory, Elizabeth Macarthur Agriculture Institute, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8026-4185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mid-February 2015, a large number of deaths were observed in the sole extant population of an endangered species of freshwater snapping turtle, Myuchelys georgesi, in a coastal river in New South Wales, Australia. Mortalities continued for approximately 7 weeks and affected mostly adult animals. More than 400 dead or dying animals were observed and population surveys conducted after the outbreak had ceased indicated that only a very small proportion of the population had survived, severely threatening the viability of the wild population. At necropsy, animals were in poor body condition, had bilateral swollen eyelids and some animals had tan foci on the skin of the ventral thighs. Histological examination revealed peri-orbital, splenic and nephric inflammation and necrosis. A virus was isolated in cell culture from a range of tissues. Nucleic acid sequencing of the virus isolate has identified the entire genome and indicates that this is a novel nidovirus that has a low level of nucleotide similarity to recognised nidoviruses. Its closest relatives are nidoviruses that have recently been described in pythons and lizards, usually in association with respiratory disease. In contrast, in the affected turtles, the most significant pathological changes were in the kidneys. Real time PCR assays developed to detect this virus demonstrated very high virus loads in affected tissues. In situ hybridisation studies confirmed the presence of viral nucleic acid in tissues in association with pathological changes. Collectively these data suggest that this virus is the likely cause of the mortalities that now threaten the survival of this species. Bellinger River Virus is the name proposed for this new virus.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesAnimalsAustraliaLizardsNidoviralesPhylogenyRiversRNA, ViralTurtlesRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID30356240
PMCPMC6200216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.