ArticleNature2018
Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?
Article in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review.Wellcome open research · 2021Pooled it
- Defining a malaria diagnostic pathway from innovation to adoption: Stakeholder perspectives on data and evidence gaps.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Open Science in eating disorders: Using current evidence to inspire a plan for increasing the transparency of our research.The International journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
- Article
- The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Choices of immediate open access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022Article
- Top health research funders' guidance on selecting journals for funded research.F1000Research · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- With open science gaining traction, do we need an Australasia PubMed Central (PMC)? A qualitative investigation.PloS one · 2019Article
- Recent developments in scholarly publishing to improve research practices in the life sciences.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2018Article
- Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review.F1000Research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30356205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.