Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356181›Full record

Observational studySpinal cord2019

Worth the effort? Weighing up the benefit and burden of continuous positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in chronic tetraplegia.

Marnie Graco, Sally E Green, Julie Tolson, Bronwyn Stevens, Maree Barnes, Alyssa Rigoni, Sandra Henderson, Carmel Nicholls, David J Berlowitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. An update on sleep disordered breathing in spinal cord injury.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marnie GracoInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. marnie.graco@austin.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6048-0147
Sally E GreenMonash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Julie TolsonInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bronwyn StevensInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Maree BarnesInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alyssa RigoniInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sandra HendersonInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Carmel NichollsInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David J BerlowitzInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2543-8722
Institute for Breathing and Sleep · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1114181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designMixed methods

objectivesContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the recommended treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim of this study was to estimate CPAP adherence in people with tetraplegia and OSA, and to explore the barriers and facilitators to CPAP use.

settingHospital outpatient department in Melbourne, Australia

methodsPeople with chronic tetraplegia and OSA were commenced with auto-titrating CPAP and supported for 1 month. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants at one month and analysed thematically. CPAP usage was measured at 1, 6 and 12 months, with "adherent" defined as achieving more than 4 h average per night.

resultsSixteen participants completed the study (80% male; mean age 56 (SD = 15)). Mean nightly CPAP use at one month was 3.1 h (SD = 2.5; 38% adherent), and at 6 months and 12 months were 2.6 h (SD = 2.8; 25% adherent) and 2.1 h (SD = 3.2; 25% adherent). The perceived benefit/burden balance strongly influenced ongoing use. Burden attributed to CPAP use was common, and included mask discomfort, and physical and emotional problems. Adherent participants were motivated by the immediate daytime benefits to mood, alertness and sleepiness. There was a tendency to not recognise symptoms of OSA until after they were treated.

conclusionCPAP use is challenging for people with tetraplegia, who experience substantial burden from using the device. When tolerated, the proximate benefits are substantial. People with tetraplegia need more intensive support for longer to help them overcome the burdens of CPAP and benefit from the treatment.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureAmbulatory CareChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionQuadriplegiaQualitative ResearchSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSpinal Cord InjuriesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30356181
OpenAlexW2898394663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.