Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356126›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2018

Ten-year results of the PORTEC-2 trial for high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma: improving patient selection for adjuvant therapy.

B G Wortman, C L Creutzberg, H Putter, I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz, J J Jobsen, L C H W Lutgens, E M van der Steen-Banasik, J W M Mens, A Slot, M C Stenfert Kroese and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07435623 (Assessment of Late Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicities in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer Requiring Postoperative IMRT and/or Brachytherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 117 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07435623 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Late Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicities in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer Requiring Postoperative IMRT and/or Brachytherapy

TypeobservationalSponsorTata Memorial HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsEndometrial Cancer, Cervix Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 269 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SEOM-GEICO clinical guidelines on endometrial cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Consensus and recommendations on vaginal-cuff Brachytherapy of the Spanish Brachytherapy Groups of SEOR and SEFM.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Guideline
  8. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adjuvant electronic brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes, toxicity, and long-term local control.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Concordance between multidisciplinary tumor board decisions and AI-based recommendations in endometrial cancer: impact of discordance direction on clinical outcomes.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

B G WortmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
C L CreutzbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
H PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
I M Jürgenliemk-SchulzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J J JobsenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
L C H W LutgensMaastricht Radiation Oncology Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
E M van der Steen-BanasikRadiotherapy Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
J W M MensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC- Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A SlotRadiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
M C Stenfert KroeseRadiotherapy Group, Deventer, The Netherlands.
B van TriestDepartment of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H W NijmanDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
E StellooDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
T BosseDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
S M de BoerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
W L J van PuttenDepartment of Biostatistics, ErasmusMC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
V T H B M SmitDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
R A NoutDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. r.a.nout@lumc.nl.
PORTEC Study Group
Leiden University Medical Center · NLRadiotherapiegroep · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPORTEC-2 was a randomised trial for women with high-intermediate risk (HIR) endometrial cancer, comparing pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). We evaluated long-term outcomes combined with the results of pathology review and molecular analysis.

methods427 women with HIR endometrial cancer were randomised between 2002-2006 to VBT or EBRT. Primary endpoint was vaginal recurrence (VR). Pathology review was done in 97.4%, combined with molecular analysis.

resultsMedian follow-up was 116 months; 10-year VR was 3.4% versus 2.4% for VBT vs. EBRT (p = 0.55). Ten-year pelvic recurrence (PR) was more frequent in the VBT group (6.3% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.004), mostly combined with distant metastases (DM). Ten-year isolated PR was 2.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.10, and DM 10.4 vs. 8.9% (p = 0.45). Overall survival for VBT vs. EBRT was 69.5% vs. 67.6% at 10 years (p = 0.72). L1CAM and p53-mutant expression and substantial lymph-vascular space invasion were risk factors for PR and DM. EBRT reduced PR in cases with these risk factors.

conclusionLong-term results of the PORTEC-2 trial confirm VBT as standard adjuvant treatment for HIR endometrial cancer. Molecular risk assessment has the potential to guide adjuvant therapy. EBRT provided better pelvic control in patients with unfavourable risk factors.

Indexed as

AgedBrachytherapyEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1Patient SelectionPelvisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy DosageSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeTumor Suppressor Protein p53VaginaNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID30356126
PMCPMC6219495
OpenAlexW2897596953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.