Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356111›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Combination of immune checkpoint blockade with DNA cancer vaccine induces potent antitumor immunity against P815 mastocytoma.

Alessandra Lopes, Kevin Vanvarenberg, Špela Kos, Sophie Lucas, Didier Colau, Benoît Van den Eynde, Véronique Préat, Gaëlle Vandermeulen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. DNA-based immunotherapy for cancer: In vivo approaches for recalcitrant targets.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Novel H-2DJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. The future of cancer immunotherapy: DNA vaccines leading the way.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cancer DNA vaccines: current preclinical and clinical developments and future perspectives.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra LopesUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Brussels, B-1200, Belgium.
Kevin VanvarenbergUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Brussels, B-1200, Belgium.
Špela KosInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Department of Experimental Oncology, Zaloska 2, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Sophie Lucasde Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, B-1200, Belgium.
Didier Colaude Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, B-1200, Belgium.
Benoît Van den Eyndede Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, B-1200, Belgium.
Véronique PréatUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Brussels, B-1200, Belgium. veronique.preat@uclouvain.be.
Gaëlle VandermeulenUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Brussels, B-1200, Belgium.
UCLouvain · BEde Duve Institute · BEInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SILudwig Cancer Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA vaccination against cancer has become a promising strategy for inducing a specific and long-lasting antitumor immunity. However, DNA vaccines fail to generate potent immune responses when used as a single therapy. To enhance their activity into the tumor, a DNA vaccine against murine P815 mastocytoma was combined with antibodies directed against the immune checkpoints CTLA4 and PD1. The combination of these two strategies delayed tumor growth and enhanced specific antitumor immune cell infiltration in comparison to the corresponding single therapies. The combination also promoted IFNg, IL12 and granzyme B production in the tumor microenvironment and decreased the formation of liver metastasis in a very early phase of tumor development, enabling 90% survival. These results underline the complementarity of DNA vaccination and immune checkpoint blockers in inducing a potent immune response, by exploiting the generation of antigen-specific T cells by the vaccine and the ability of immune checkpoint blockers to enhance T cell activity and infiltration in the tumor. These findings suggest how and why a rational combination therapy can overcome the limits of DNA vaccination but could also allow responses to immune checkpoint blockers in a larger proportion of subjects.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCancer VaccinesCTLA-4 AntigenImmunotherapyMastocytomaMiceNeoplasm MetastasisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentVaccines, DNAAntibodies, MonoclonalCancer VaccinesCTLA-4 AntigenCTLA4 protein, humanPdcd1 protein, mouseProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID30356111
PMCPMC6200811
OpenAlexW2896837325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.