Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356071›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Enrichment and Quantification of Epitope-specific CD4+ T Lymphocytes using Ferromagnetic Iron-gold and Nickel Nanowires.

Daniel E Shore, Thamotharampillai Dileepan, Jaime F Modiano, Marc K Jenkins, Bethanie J H Stadler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel E ShoreChemical Engineering & Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Thamotharampillai DileepanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jaime F ModianoAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-7648
Marc K JenkinsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-7655
Bethanie J H StadlerChemical Engineering & Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. stadler@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Costimulatory Signals in CD4+ T Cell ActivationR37AI027998 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI JENKINS, MARC KEVIN · 2008 to 2017
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI027998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epitope-specific CD4+ T lymphocytes were magnetically enriched using ferromagnetic Ni and Fe-Au nanowires coated with a monomer containing a major histocompatibility complex class II-bound peptide epitope (pMHCII). The enriched lymphocytes were subsequently quantified using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). This was the first use of magnetic nanowires for cell sorting using FACS, and improvements in both specificity and fluorescent signal strength were predicted due to higher particle moments and lengths than conventional paramagnetic beads. Three different types of nanowires (Ni, Fe with Au tip and Fe-Au multilayers) were made by electrodeposition. Ni nanowires separated fewer T cells than Au tipped Fe nanowires, likely because Ni has a lower magnetic moment than Fe. Fe-Au multilayer nanowires separated more T cells than Au-tipped Fe nanowires because there was more monomer per nanowire. Also, increasing the amount of monomer increased the number of CD4+ cells separated. Compared to conventional paramagnetic beads, the nanowires had lower specificity for CD4+ T cells, but had stronger fluorescent signals due to more fluorophores per particle. This results in broader FACS baseline separation between the positive and negative cells, which is useful to detect T cells, even those with lower binding affinity for pMHCII ligands.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesElectroplatingEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFlow CytometryGoldHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIIronLymph NodesMagnetsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanowiresNickelProtein BindingSensitivity and SpecificityEpitopes, T-LymphocyteGoldHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIIronNickel

Identifiers

PMID30356071
PMCPMC6200781
OpenAlexW2897397736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.