Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30356047›Full record

Observational studyNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2018

Prospective observational cohort study of symptom control prediction in paediatric asthma by using the Royal College of Physicians three questions.

Glen Andrews, David K H Lo, Matthew Richardson, Andrew Wilson, Erol A Gaillard

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Glen AndrewsHonorary Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Infection Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
David K H LoNIHR Leicester-Biomedical Research Centre and Department of Infection Immunity and Inflammation, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3220-7159
Matthew RichardsonNIHR Leicester-Biomedical Research Centre and Department of Infection Immunity and Inflammation, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Andrew WilsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Erol A GaillardNIHR Leicester-Biomedical Research Centre and Department of Infection Immunity and Inflammation, Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. eag15@le.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-8133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Royal College of Physicians three questions (RCP3Q) is widely used for assessing asthma control within primary care in the UK, despite limited evidence in children. This study compared the RCP3Q as a tool for assessing asthma control in children (5-16 years) against the validated Asthma Control Test (ACT), Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT), and Mini-Paediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniPAQLQ). We conducted a prospective observational cohort study involving children from eight primary care practices in Leicestershire. Children with doctor diagnosed asthma, or receiving regular asthma medication, were invited to participate. A total of 319 participants completed the MiniPAQLQ and the C-ACT/ACT questionnaires, before RCP3Q responses were collected as part of their routine asthma review conducted immediately afterwards. RCP3Q sensitivity for detecting uncontrolled asthma ranged from 43-60% and specificity from 80-82%. Using an RCP3Q score ≥2 to predict uncontrolled asthma and an RCP3Q score of zero to predict well-controlled asthma resulted in 10% of participants misclassified as uncontrolled and 8% as well-controlled, respectively. Using an RCP3Q threshold score of ≥1 resulted in 25% of participants being misclassified as uncontrolled. Our data suggests limited utility of the RCP3Q to assess asthma control in children. Alternative indicators of asthma control, such as the validated Asthma Control Test and the Children's Asthma Control Test should be considered instead.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationAdolescentAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleForecastingHumansMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30356047
PMCPMC6200751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.