SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018
Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of construction defects on construction and demolition waste management in building construction: a systematic literature review.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematic Literature Review of Green and Sustainable Logistics: Bibliometric Analysis, Research Trend and Knowledge Taxonomy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Pooled it
- Integrating automation into construction waste quantification: A review of digital innovations for sustainable resource management.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2026Review
- 44-year journey (1980-2024): scientometric insights into Sigesbeckiae herba and update on its medicinal properties and phytochemicals profile.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- A study on the waste generation rates and recycling potential for the construction and demolition waste in Dhaka, Bangladesh.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2024Article
- The impact of Jürgen Habermas's scientific production: a scientometric review.Scientometrics · 2023Article
- Impact of Recycler Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance of Construction and Demolition Waste Resource Utilization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Analyzing the Freight Characteristics and Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Hauling Trucks: Big Data Analytics of Hong Kong.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Comments on: Huang et al. (2019) Emerging trends and research foci in gastrointestinal microbiome', J. Transl. Med., 17: 67.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Article
- BIM-Based Visualization Research in the Construction Industry: A Network Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Review
- Comment on Chen, J.; Su, Y.; Si, H.; Chen, J. Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In past decades, the massive generation of construction and demolition waste (CDW) was increasingly threatening the public environment and humanity health worldwide. A large amount of research has been devoted to the CDW from difference perspectives. However, few scholars have attempted to summarize and review the extant studies, especially in the managerial areas of CDW (MA-CDW). This paper fills this gap via a systematic and quantitative review in the CDW management field. Employing the scientometric analysis method, a total of 261 articles published from 2006 to 2018 were collected to construct the knowledge map and comprehensive framework for MA-CDW. Results show that the overall evolutionary trend of MA-CDW was from basic management concepts to internal and external challenges analysis, to organizational strategy and innovative management practices. The major MA-CDW knowledge domains were identified and summarized into four pillars, namely: (1) factor and challenge; (2) composition and quantification; (3) assessment and comparison; and (4) technology and method. Based on the trend, knowledge gaps and future research directions were found out and discussed. This study contributes to the existing MA-CDW knowledge by presenting a comprehensive knowledge framework. Furthermore, these findings can provide the researchers and practitioners with an in-depth understanding for the sustainable governance of CDW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.