ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018
Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of the membrane composed of biodegradable polycaprolactone and polyglycolic acid layers in guided bone regeneration.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Clinical Evidence on Resorbable Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials for Alveolar Bone Regeneration: A Scoping Review Focusing on Brushite, Monetite, and Tricalcium Phosphates.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing/Bioprinting and Cellular Therapies for Regenerative Medicine: Current Advances.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Evaluation of a Novel Bioresorbable Device for Guided Bone Regeneration: An In Vitro CBCT Study on Pig Jaws.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Scaffolds for Guided Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Resorbable GBR Scaffolds in Oral and Maxillofacial Tissue Engineering: Design, Fabrication, and Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The 3Rs in Experimental Liver Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- An overview of 3D printed metal implants in orthopedic applications: Present and future perspectives.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Analyses of the Cellular Interactions between the Ossification of Collagen-Based Barrier Membranes and the Underlying Bone Defects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A Review on Manufacturing Processes of Biocomposites Based on Poly(α-Esters) and Bioactive Glass Fillers for Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Nano-Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds Loaded with Bioactive Factors and Drugs for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Additive Manufactured Polymers in Dentistry, Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives-A Review.Polymers · 2022Review
- Editorial of the Special Issue: "Soft and Hard Tissue Regeneration".Biomedicines · 2022Article
- In Vivo Biocompatibility Investigation of an Injectable Calcium Carbonate (Vaterite) as a Bone Substitute including Compositional Analysis via SEM-EDX Technology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- The Granule Size Mediates the In Vivo Foreign Body Response and the Integration Behavior of Bone Substitutes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Application of Polycaprolactone in Three-Dimensional Printing Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2021Review
- A Review on Current Trends of Polymers in Orthodontics: BPA-Free and Smart Materials.Polymers · 2021Review
- Ex Vivo and In Vivo Analyses of Novel 3D-Printed Bone Substitute Scaffolds Incorporating Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules for Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Material Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration: Toward Application in the Clinics.Advanced functional materials · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become an important tool in the field of tissue engineering and its further development will lead to completely new clinical possibilities. The ability to create tissue scaffolds with controllable characteristics, such as internal architecture, porosity, and interconnectivity make it highly desirable in comparison to conventional techniques, which lack a defined structure and repeatability between scaffolds. Furthermore, 3D printing allows for the production of scaffolds with patient-specific dimensions using computer-aided design. The availability of commercially available 3D printed permanent implants is on the rise; however, there are yet to be any commercially available biodegradable/bioresorbable devices. This review will compare the main 3D printing techniques of: stereolithography; selective laser sintering; powder bed inkjet printing and extrusion printing; for the fabrication of biodegradable/bioresorbable bone tissue scaffolds; and, discuss their potential for dental applications, specifically augmentation of the alveolar ridge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.