ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2018
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-positive scleritis: Clinical profile of patients from a tuberculosis-endemic region.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Clinical profile and management of granulomatosis with polyangiitis-associated scleritis from a tertiary care hospital in South India.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Clinical profile, treatment, and visual outcome of scleritis: A single ophthalmologist experience.Oman journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the clinical profile of a series of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated scleritis in Indian population.
methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of 33 eyes of 26 consecutive patients with scleritis, who tested positive for either antibody to proteinase 3 [anti-PR3/cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (cANCA)] or myeloperoxidase [anti-MPO/perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA)] between 2006 and 2015.
results: The mean age at presentation was 54.1 (11.1) years and 61.5% of the patients were female. Underlying systemic disorder was found in 46.2% of patients and includes granulomatosis with polyangitis (30.8%) and tuberculosis (15.4%). Necrotizing scleritis (48.5%) was the most common scleritis observed, followed by diffuse anterior scleritis (42.4%). Positive cANCA was found in 65.4% of patients and 34.6% was found positive for pANCA. Four of the six patients with positive Mantoux test were started on anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) by pulmonologist. Cyclophosphamide was the most common immunosuppressive and 11.5% of the patients required combination of two immunosuppressives. Seventeen eyes developed cataract and four eyes required patch graft. Female gender was more frequently associated with pANCA-associated scleritis than cANCA (P = 0.037). Incidence of necrotizing scleritis was higher in patients with positive cANCA, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.806). cANCA-positive patients had statistically significant higher association with systemic rheumatic diseases (P = 0.021).
conclusionNecrotizing scleritis is the most common subtype of scleritis in ANCA-positive individuals and even in the absence of systemic involvement. All patients with ANCA positivity should be thoroughly screened to rule out any evidence of tuberculosis, especially in tuberculosis-endemic region before planning aggressive immunomodulatory therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.