Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30355858›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2018

Lasers in glaucoma.

Harsh Kumar, Tarannum Mansoori, Gazella B Warjri, Bindu I Somarajan, Suman Bandil, Viney Gupta

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Ophthalmic surgeries onFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Genetic Aspects of Glaucoma: An Updated Review.Current molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A New Mechanism of Silicone Oil-Induced Glaucoma and Its Management.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lasers in Glaucoma: an Overview.International ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harsh KumarCentre for Sight, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi, India.
Tarannum MansooriAnand Eye Institute, Sita Lakshmi Glaucoma Center, Habsiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Gazella B WarjriDr RP Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bindu I SomarajanDr RP Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Suman BandilCentre for Sight, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi, India.
Viney GuptaDr RP Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Centre for Sight · INL V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While lasers have been used for many years for the treatment of glaucoma, proper indications and use of the procedures need to be considered before their application. This review summarizes the important laser procedures in Glaucoma.

Indexed as

LasersFiltering SurgeryGlaucomaHumansLaser TherapyCyclophotocoagulationlaser iridoplastylaser iridotomylaser trabeculoplasty

Identifiers

PMID30355858
PMCPMC6213662
OpenAlexW2898220865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.