Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30355755›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2018

Molecular dissection of nuclear paraspeckles: towards understanding the emerging world of the RNP milieu.

Shinichi Nakagawa, Tomohiro Yamazaki, Tetsuro Hirose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. TDP-43 in nuclear condensates: where, how, and why.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nondomain biopolymers: Flexible molecular strategies to acquire biological functions.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shinichi NakagawaRNA Biology Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan nakagawas@pharm.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-6806-7493
Tomohiro YamazakiInstitute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0815, Japan.
Tetsuro HiroseInstitute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0815, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paraspeckles are nuclear bodies built on an architectural long noncoding RNA, NEAT1, and a series of studies have revealed their molecular components, fine internal structures and cellular and physiological functions. Emerging lines of evidence suggest that paraspeckle formation is elicited by phase separation of associating RNA-binding proteins containing intrinsically disordered regions, which induce ordered arrangement of paraspeckle components along NEAT1. In this review, we will summarize the history of paraspeckle research over the last couple of decades, especially focusing on the function and structure of the nuclear bodies. We also discuss the future directions of research on long noncoding RNAs that form 'RNP milieux', large and flexible phase-separated ribonucleoprotein complexes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCell NucleusDisease Models, AnimalHumansMice, KnockoutMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, FluorescenceNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingNEAT1 long non-coding RNA, humanNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Long NoncodinglncRNANEAT1nuclear bodiesparaspecklessuper-resolution microscope

Identifiers

PMID30355755
PMCPMC6223218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.