Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30355663›Full record

ArticlemSphere2018

Modifying Saccharomyces cerevisiae Adhesion Properties Regulates Yeast Ecosystem Dynamics.

Debra Rossouw, Skye P Meiring, Florian F Bauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Debra RossouwInstitute for Wine Biotechnology, Stellenbosch, South Africa debra@sun.ac.za fb2@sun.ac.za.
Skye P MeiringInstitute for Wine Biotechnology, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Florian F BauerInstitute for Wine Biotechnology, Stellenbosch, South Africa debra@sun.ac.za fb2@sun.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical contact between yeast species, in addition to better-understood and reported metabolic interactions, has recently been proposed to significantly impact the relative fitness of these species in cocultures. Such data have been generated by using membrane bioreactors, which physically separate two yeast species. However, doubts persist about the degree that the various membrane systems allow for continuous and complete metabolic contact, including the exchange of proteins. Here, we provide independent evidence for the importance of physical contact by using a genetic system to modify the degree of physical contact and, therefore, the degree of asexual intraspecies and interspecies adhesion in yeast. Such adhesion is controlled by a family of structurally related cell wall proteins encoded by the

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell CommunicationMannose-Binding LectinsPopulation DynamicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomycetalesMannose-Binding LectinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsadhesioncell-cell interactioninterspeciesyeast

Identifiers

PMID30355663
PMCPMC6200983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.