Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30355628›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Feedforward and Feedback Control Share an Internal Model of the Arm's Dynamics.

Rodrigo S Maeda, Tyler Cluff, Paul L Gribble, J Andrew Pruszynski

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05013762 (Fast Training Promotes Recovery of Arm Movements Post-stroke Via Cerebellar-mediated Anticipatory Feedforward Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05013762 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Fast Training Promotes Recovery of Arm Movements Post-stroke Via Cerebellar-mediated Anticipatory Feedforward Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled44ConditionsCerebrovascular StrokeArmsFast intervention, Active Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interchangeable Role of Motor Cortex and Reafference for the Stable Execution of an Orofacial Action.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Proprioceptive and Visual Feedback Responses in Macaques Exploit Goal Redundancy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rodrigo S MaedaBrain and Mind Institute.ORCID 0000-0001-9110-1162
Tyler CluffFaculty of Kinesiology, and.
Paul L GribbleBrain and Mind Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-1368-032X
J Andrew PruszynskiBrain and Mind Institute, andrew.pruszynski@uwo.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0786-0081
Western University · CARobarts Clinical Trials · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has shown that, when countering external forces, the nervous system adjusts not only predictive (i.e., feedforward) control of reaching but also reflex (i.e., feedback) responses to mechanical perturbations. Here we show that altering the physical properties of the arm (i.e., intersegmental dynamics) causes the nervous system to adjust feedforward control and that this learning transfers to feedback responses even though the latter were never directly trained. Forty-five human participants (30 females) performed a single-joint elbow reaching task and countered mechanical perturbations that created pure elbow motion. In our first experiment, we altered intersegmental dynamics by asking participants to generate pure elbow movements when the shoulder joint was either free to rotate or locked by the robotic manipulandum. With the shoulder unlocked, we found robust activation of shoulder flexor muscles for pure elbow flexion trials, as required to counter the interaction torques that arise at the shoulder because of forearm rotation. After locking the shoulder joint, which cancels these interaction torques, we found a substantial reduction in shoulder muscle activity over many trials. In our second experiment, we tested whether such learning transfers to feedback control. Mechanical perturbations applied to the arm with the shoulder unlocked revealed that feedback responses also account for intersegmental dynamics. After locking the shoulder joint, we found a substantial reduction in shoulder feedback responses, as appropriate for the altered intersegmental dynamics. Our work suggests that feedforward and feedback control share an internal model of the arm's dynamics.

Indexed as

AdultArmElbow JointFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementReflex, StretchShoulder JointYoung Adultfeedback controlinternal modelintersegmental dynamicsmotor learningreflexvoluntary movements

Identifiers

PMID30355628
PMCPMC6596259
OpenAlexW2810857017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.