ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018
Oncology Patient Interest in the Use of New Technologies to Manage Their Disease: Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Smartphone Apps for Pulmonary Hypertension: Systematic Search and Content Evaluation.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Pooled it
- Smartphone Apps for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: Systematic Review and Evaluation of Content.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Pooled it
- How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review.International journal of medical informatics · 2021Pooled it
- Assessment of the Fairness of Privacy Policies of Mobile Health Apps: Scale Development and Evaluation in Cancer Apps.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Pooled it
- Smartphone measurements of physical activity and fitness are associated with early trial discontinuation of patients in (hemato)oncology phase I/II clinical trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Trial
- Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial assessing a smartphone Application to reduce unmet needs among people diagnosed with CancEr (ACE).Cancer medicine · 2020Trial
- Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Patients With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic or Supportive Therapy: Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Mobile Health App Attitudes and Adoption Among Oncology Providers: Cross-Sectional National Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the ALIBIRD mHealth Platform for Care of Patients With Lung Cancer: Prospective Pilot Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- New Technologies and Digital Health Tools in Patients With Solid Tumors and Hematological Malignancies: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Survey Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Supporting Medication Adherence in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Using the BMT4me mHealth App: Mixed Methods Usability Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- The Use of Technology Platforms for Nutrition Education in Cirrhosis: A Cross-Sectional Study of Patients' Acceptability and Capabilities.Canadian liver journal · 2025Article
- Design, development and evaluation of a mobile-based self-care application for patients with COVID-19 not requiring hospitalization; a study of Northwest of Iran.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Consumers' Preferences for Purchasing mHealth Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: characteristics of use and interactions with antineoplastic agents.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Observational
- An investigation of the use of app technology to support clinical management of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML).Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2023Article
- Communication Skills Training for Oncology Clinicians After the 21st Century Cures Act: The Need to Contextualize Patient Portal-Delivered Test Results.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Older Adults' Use of and Interest in Technology and Applications for Health Management: A Survey Study.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2023Article
- A discrete choice experiment to examine the factors influencing consumers' willingness to purchase health apps.mHealth · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInformation and communication technologies (ICTs) in oncology can revolutionize the medical care of cancer patients. ICTs can promote patients' empowerment and real-time disease monitoring. There is limited information about the impact of ICTs in cancer patients or their level of interest in using these tools for greater management of their condition.
objectiveThis study aimed to understand the ICT usage profile in hematology-oncology patients to identify their needs and determine their level of interest in these technologies as a means of managing their disease.
methodsA 28-item questionnaire was drawn up by a multidisciplinary team including pharmacists and oncologists. The questions were organized into 3 blocks, which were as follows: block A-sociodemographic characteristics; block B-use of ICTs when searching for health-related information; and block C-usage preferences for health apps. Hematology-oncology patients receiving treatment between May and July 2017 were included. A paper copy of the questionnaire was handed over to patients in either the day hospital or the pharmaceutical care consultancy in pharmacy services.
resultsA total of 650 questionnaires were handed out, with a participation of 94.0% (611/650). Patient sociodemographic characteristics were as follows: mean age was 57.8 years (age range: 19-91). Of 611 participants, 40.7% (249/611) had a university education, and 45.1% (276/611) of participants reported their overall state of health to be good. Results from use of ICTs when searching for health-related information were as follows: 87.1% (532/611) of participants were interested in being informed about health-related matters. Of all participants, 75.5% (532/611) sought information from health professionals and 61.3% (375/611) on the internet. Before going to their doctor's appointment, 21.8% (133/611) of patients looked up information about their disease or treatment on the internet. This access to the internet rose to 50.9% (311/611) after their first medical appointment with their oncologist. Usage preferences for health apps were as follows: 82.7% (505/611) had a smartphone, whereas 20.3% (124/611) had a health app installed. Overall, 81.5% (498/611) would use an app if their health professional recommended it to them, but 39.6% (242/611) were not willing to pay for it.
conclusionsThe hematology-oncology patients showed a great deal of interest in searching for health-related information by means of ICTs, especially using smartphones and apps. The issues that drew the most interest in terms of apps were appointment management, advice on disease management, and communication with health professionals. Free access to these features and the recommendation by a health professional are important factors when it comes to their use. Therefore, the health care provider is a key element in the recommendation of ICTs, providing their knowledge and experience concerning their correct usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.