Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30355362›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2018

A phase I-II controlled randomized trial using a promising novel cell-free formulation for articular cartilage regeneration as treatment of severe osteoarthritis of the knee.

Ivan Delgado-Enciso, Juan Paz-Garcia, Jose Valtierra-Alvarez, Jorge Preciado-Ramirez, Roman Almeida-Trinidad, Jose Guzman-Esquivel, Martha A Mendoza-Hernandez, Alberto Garcia-Vega, Alejandro D Soriano-Hernandez, Jose L Cortes-Bazan and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Effects of rAAV-MediatedJournal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ivan Delgado-EncisoInstituto Estatal de Cancerologia, Colima State Health Services, 28000, Colima, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9848-862X
Juan Paz-GarciaCentro Hospitalario Union, Villa de Álvarez, 28970, Colima, Mexico.
Jose Valtierra-AlvarezHospital Regional Universitario, Colima State Health Services, 28019, Colima, Mexico.
Jorge Preciado-RamirezCentro Hospitalario Union, Villa de Álvarez, 28970, Colima, Mexico.
Roman Almeida-TrinidadInstituto Estatal de Cancerologia, Colima State Health Services, 28000, Colima, Mexico.
Jose Guzman-EsquivelHospital General de Zona No. 1 IMSS, Villa de Álvarez, 28983, Colima, Mexico.
Martha A Mendoza-HernandezSchool of Medicine, University of Colima, 28030, Colima, Mexico.
Alberto Garcia-VegaHospital General de Zona No. 1 IMSS, Villa de Álvarez, 28983, Colima, Mexico.
Alejandro D Soriano-HernandezInstituto Estatal de Cancerologia, Colima State Health Services, 28000, Colima, Mexico.
Jose L Cortes-BazanInstituto Estatal de Cancerologia, Colima State Health Services, 28000, Colima, Mexico.
Hector R Galvan-SalazarSchool of Medicine, University of Colima, 28030, Colima, Mexico.
Ariana Cabrera-LiconaEsteripharma México, S.A. de C.V, Patricio Sanz 1582, Colonia del Valle Centro, 03100, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Iram P Rodriguez-SanchezSchool of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Margarita L Martinez-FierroMolecular Medicine Laboratory, Academic Unit of Human Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, 98160, Zacatecas, Mexico.
Josuel Delgado-EncisoFoundation for Cancer Ethics, Education and Research of the Cancerology State Institute, 28085, Colima, Mexico.
Brenda Paz-MichelEsteripharma México, S.A. de C.V, Patricio Sanz 1582, Colonia del Valle Centro, 03100, Ciudad de México, Mexico. bpaz@esteripharma.com.mx.
Universidad de Colima · MXHospital General De Zona · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Zacatecas "Francisco García Salinas" · MXUniversidad del Valle de México · MX

Funding

FOSISS CONACYT 2016 272792INFRAESTRUCTURA CONACYT 2016 270485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA promising novel cell-free bioactive formulation for articular cartilage regeneration, called BIOF2, has recently been tested in pre-clinical trials. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BIOF2 for intra-articular application in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee.

methodsA prospective, randomized, 3-arm, parallel group clinical trial was conducted. It included 24 patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee (WOMAC score 65.9 ± 17). Before they entered the study, all the patients were under osteoarthritis control through the standard treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), prescribed by their family physician. Patients were distributed into three groups of 8 patients each (intra-articular BIOF2, total joint arthroplasty, or conservative treatment with NSAIDs alone). The WOMAC score, RAPID3 score, and Rasmussen clinical score were evaluated before treatment and at months 3, 6, and 12. BIOF2 was applied at months 0, 3, and 6. Complete blood count and blood chemistry parameters were determined in the BIOF2 group before treatment, at 72 h, and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12. In addition, articular cartilage volume was evaluated (according to MRI) at the beginning of the study and at month 12.

resultsThe NSAID group showed no improvement at follow-up. Arthroplasty and BIOF2 treatments showed significant improvement in all the scoring scales starting at month 3. There were no statistically significant differences between the BIOF2 group and the arthroplasty group at month 6 (WOMAC score: 19.3 ± 18 vs 4.3 ± 5; P = 0.24) or month 12 (WOMAC score: 15.6 ± 15 vs 15.7 ± 17; P = 1.0). Arthroplasty and BIOF2 were successful at month 12 (according to a WOMAC score: ≤ 16) in 75% of the patients and the daily use of NSAIDs was reduced, compared with the group treated exclusively with NSAIDs (RR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.87, P = 0.02. This result was the same for BIOF2 vs NSAIDs and arthroplasty vs NSAIDs). BIOF2 significantly increased the articular cartilage by 22% (26.1 ± 10 vs 31.9 ± 10 cm

conclusionsThe intra-articular application of the new bioactive cell-free formulation (BIOF2) was well tolerated and showed no significative differences with arthroplasty for the treatment of severe osteoarthritis of the knee. BIOF2 can regenerate articular cartilage and is an easily implemented alternative therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Trial registration Cuban Public Registry of Clinical Trials (RPCEC) Database RPCEC00000250. Registered 08/15/2017-Retrospectively registered, http://rpcec.sld.cu/en/trials/RPCEC00000250-En .

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBlood Cell CountCartilage, ArticularCell-Free SystemChondrocytesChondrogenesisFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeRegenerationAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBIOF2SteroidsArthroplastyCartilage regenerationChondrocytesChondrogenesisClinical trialKneeMesenchymal cellsNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugsOsteoarthritisStem cellTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30355362
PMCPMC6199741
OpenAlexW2898181250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.