Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30355342›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2018

Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains by spa typing and pulsed field gel electrophoresis methods.

Tülin Güven Gökmen, Yıldız Kalayci, Akgün Yaman, Fatih Köksal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Antimicrobial Resistance, Multilocus Sequence, andBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Polish journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Methicillin-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tülin Güven GökmenCeyhan Veterinary Faculty, Department of Microbiology, Cukurova University, 01930, Adana, Turkey.
Yıldız KalayciMicrobiology Laboratory, Adana City Hospital, 01380, Adana, Turkey. tulinguven01@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8131-0470
Akgün YamanDepartment of Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Cukurova University, 01380, Adana, Turkey.
Fatih KöksalDepartment of Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Cukurova University, 01380, Adana, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid detection of sources and transmission routes by molecular methods provides key data for risk management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced infections acquired in both the community and hospitals. This study aimed to determine the clonal relationship of methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains isolated from our hospital by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and Staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing methods and to identify the predominant clones in Cukurova Region, Turkey.

resultsAll isolates analyzed by PFGE were distributed among 11 clusters. Clusters A (n = 19) and B (n = 27) were 84.1% similar and accounted for 61% of all samples. All isolates were distributed among 18 spa types, with the most common type being t030 with 31 isolates (41.3%), followed by t223 with nine isolates (12%) and t127 with seven isolates (9.3%).

conclusionsWe found that t030 was the most common spa type in the area where the study was conducted, as also previously shown in studies undertaken in Turkey. However, the rate of t030 in our study was below the rates reported in the literature. We also detected some rare or sporadic spa types like t127, which has not been previously defined in our country. We consider that the spa typing and PFGE methods are useful for research on clonal relations in monitoring the changing prevalent clones in specific regions.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesCross InfectionDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenotypeHospitalsHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcal Protein ATurkeyDNA, BacterialStaphylococcal Protein AEpidemiologyMRSAPFGEProtein aspa typing

Identifiers

PMID30355342
PMCPMC6201486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.