Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30355317›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2018

Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?

Hope Seib McMaster, Valerie A Stander, Christianna S Williams, Kelly A Woodall, Christopher A O'Malley, Lauren M Bauer, Evelyn P Davila, Millennium Cohort Family Study Team

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Role ofJournal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The impact of family stressors and resources on military spouse's perception of post-deployment reunion stress.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hope Seib McMasterThe Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., 6720A Rockledge Drive, Suite 100, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA. hope.m.mcmaster.ctr@mail.mil.ORCID 0000-0002-8585-0623
Valerie A StanderNaval Health Research Center, 140 Sylvester Road, San Diego, CA, 92106, USA.
Christianna S WilliamsAbt Associates, Inc., Central Park West, Suite 210, 5001 South Miami Boulevard, Durham, NC, 27703, USA.
Kelly A WoodallThe Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., 6720A Rockledge Drive, Suite 100, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA.
Christopher A O'MalleyLeidos, 11955 Freedom Drive, Reston, VA, 20190, USA.
Lauren M BauerThe Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., 6720A Rockledge Drive, Suite 100, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA.
Evelyn P DavilaEmory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Millennium Cohort Family Study Team
Henry M. Jackson Foundation · USLeidos (United States) · USEmory University · USSchulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile enrolling dyads in research studies is not uncommon, there is limited literature on the utility of different recruitment strategies and the resulting selection biases. This paper examined two recruitment strategies used to enroll military couples in a longitudinal study, assessing the impact of both strategies on the representativeness of the final study sample.

methodDescriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to 1) identify characteristics associated with spouse referral, 2) compare response rates based on recruitment strategy and assess whether recruitment strategy modified correlates of response propensity among spouses, and 3) assess whether referred spouse characteristics differed from non-referred spouses in the final sample. The study sample consisted of married US service members with 2-5 years of military service as of October 2011 and their spouses.

resultsService members who referred their spouses to participate in the Millennium Cohort Family Study were more likely to be male, have children, serve in the Army, and have combat deployment experience than those who did not refer their spouse. Nearly two-thirds (n = 5331, 64.9%) of referred spouses participated in the Family Study, compared with less than one-third (n = 3458, 29.5%) of directly contacted spouses. Spouse characteristics also differed significantly between recruitment groups.

conclusionsOverall results suggest that minimal bias was introduced by using a referral recruitment methodology. Service members appeared to be more likely to refer their spouses if they perceived the research topic as relevant to their spouse, such that male service members with combat deployment experience were more likely to refer female spouses caring for multiple children. Referred spouses were significantly more likely to respond to the Millennium Cohort Family Study survey than those who were directly contacted; however, the overall success rate of using a referral strategy was less than recruiting spouses through direct contact. Differences between referred spouses and spouses contacted directly mirrored service member referring characteristics.

Indexed as

FamilyResearch DesignAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMarriageMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelPatient SelectionReferral and ConsultationSelection BiasSpousesSurveys and QuestionnairesCouplesDyadEpidemiologyMethodsMilitaryRecruitmentReferralResearchStudy methodologySurvey

Identifiers

PMID30355317
PMCPMC6201494
OpenAlexW2898562226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.