ArticleBMC genomics2018
Distinct esophageal adenocarcinoma molecular subtype has subtype-specific gene expression and mutation patterns.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular stratification of esophageal adenocarcinoma: implications for prognosis and treatment strategy.Oncogene · 2026Review
- Increased reflux secondary bile acids are associated with changes to the microbiome and transcriptome in Barrett's esophagus.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- A three-subtype prognostic classification based on base excision repair and oxidative stress genes in lung adenocarcinoma and its relationship with tumor microenvironment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Therapeutic potential of flavonoids in gastrointestinal cancer: Focus on signaling pathways and improvement strategies (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
- GABRP inhibits the progression of oesophageal cancer by regulating CFTR: Integrating bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation.International journal of experimental pathology · 2024Article
- The transcriptional landscape of endogenous retroelements delineates esophageal adenocarcinoma subtypes.NAR cancer · 2023Article
- Clinical significance of molecular subtypes of gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Review
- Review
- Prognostic Value of Immune-Related Multi-IncRNA Signatures Associated With Tumor Microenvironment in Esophageal Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Understanding Esophageal Cancer: The Challenges and Opportunities for the Next Decade.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- OSblca: A Web Server for Investigating Prognostic Biomarkers of Bladder Cancer Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal carcinoma (EC), consists of two histological types, esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). EAC accounted for 10% of EC for centuries; however, the prevalence of EAC has alarmingly risen 6 times and increased to about 50% of EC in recent 30 years in the western countries, while treatment options for EAC patients are still limited. Stratification of molecular subtypes by gene expression profiling methods had offered opportunities for targeted therapies. However, the molecular subtype in EAC has not been defined. Hence, Identification of EAC molecular subtypes is needed and will provide important insights for future new therapies.
resultsWe performed meta-analysis of gene expression profiling data on three independent EAC cohorts and showed that there are two common molecular subtypes in EAC. Each of the two EAC molecular subtypes has subtype specific expression patterns and mutation signatures. Genes which were over-expressed in subtype I EACs rather than subtype II EAC cases, were enriched in biological processes including epithelial cell differentiation, keratinocyte differentiation, and KEGG pathways including basal cell carcinoma. TP53 and CDKN2A are significantly mutated in both EAC subtypes. 24 genes including SMAD4 were found to be only significantly mutated in subtype I EAC cases, while 30 genes including ARID1A are only significantly mutated in subtype II EACs.
conclusionTwo EAC molecular subtypes were defined and validated. This finding may offer new opportunities for targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.