Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30355297›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Differences in pregnancy outcomes and obstetric care between asylum seeking and resident women: a cross-sectional study in a German federal state, 2010-2016.

Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Louise Biddle, Stella Preussler, Andreas Mueller, Joachim Szecsenyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kayvan BozorgmehrDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, INF 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. kayvan.bozorgmehr@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Louise BiddleDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, INF 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stella PreusslerInstitute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas MuellerClinic of Gynaecology, Karlsruhe City Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius Arkaden, INF 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung FKZ 01GY1611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite large numbers of asylum seekers, there is a lack of evidence on pregnancy outcomes and obstetric care of asylum seeking women in Germany.

methodsCross-sectional study (2010-2016) using administrative data of the main referral hospital for pregnant asylum seekers of the reception center of a large federal state in South Germany. INCLUSION CRITERIA: women aged 12-50 years, admitted in relation to pregnancy, childbirth or post-partum complications. OUTCOMES: differences between asylum seekers and residents in the prevalence of high-risk pregnancy conditions, abortive outcomes/stillbirths, peri- and postnatal maternal complications, neonatal complications, and caesarean sections. ANALYSIS: odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) obtained by single and multiple logistic regression analysis. Attributable fractions among the exposed (Afe) and among the total population (Afp) were calculated for selected outcomes.

resultsOf 19,864 women admitted in relation to pregnancy, childbirth or post-partum complications, 2.9% (n = 569) were asylum seekers. Adjusted odds for high-risk pregnancy conditions (OR = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.63-0.91, p < 0.0001), caesarean sections (OR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.66-1.07, p = 0.17) and perinatal complications (OR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.55-0.78, p < 0.0001) were lower; those for abortive outcomes/stillbirths (OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.11-2.20, p = 0.01) and postnatal complications (OR = 1.80, 95%CI: 0.93-3.19, p = 0.06) higher among asylum seeking women relative to residents in models adjusted for age, length of admission, and high-risk pregnancy conditions. The Afe for abortive outcomes and stillbirths among asylum seekers was 40.3% (95% CI, 16.3-56.5) and the Afp was 1.8%. The Afe for postnatal complications was 53.1% (95% CI, 7.1-74.0) and the Afp was 3.1%.

conclusionAsylum seeking women are at higher risk of abortive outcomes/stillbirths and show a tendency towards higher postnatal complications. This excess risk calls for adequate responses by health care providers and policy makers to improve outpatient postnatal care in reception centers and mitigate adverse birth outcomes among asylum seeking women. Although further research is needed, scaling-up midwivery care, improving outreach by maternity care teams, and routinely identifying and addressing mental illness by psychosocial services could be ways forward to improve outcomes in this population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCesarean SectionChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMiddle AgedPerinatal CarePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrevalenceRefugeesAsylum seekersCaesarian sectionHealth inequalityMaternity careMigrationPostnatal carePregnancy outcomeReception centerSocial epidemiologyStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID30355297
PMCPMC6201533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.