ArticleStroke2018
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Factors Associated With Ischemic Stroke in Patients Suspected of Cervical Artery Dissection.
Article in Stroke, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Sonographic features associated with ischemic stroke in patients with extracranial internal carotid artery dissection: a single-center exploratory study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Outer lumen arterial imaging with CTA: A potential tool to diagnose vertebral artery dissection.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Spontaneous bilateral vertebral artery dissection complicated by hemodynamic posterior circulation stroke: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- [Spontaneous craniocervical dissection].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- High-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging in extracranial cervical artery dissection.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Association of diabetes and white blood cell count with stroke in patients with carotid artery dissection.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Initial and follow-up high-resolution vessel wall MRI study of spontaneous cervicocranial artery dissection.European radiology · 2024Article
- Impact on etiology diagnosis by high-resolution vessel wall imaging in young adults with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Abnormal flow pattern of low wall shear stress and high oscillatory shear index in spontaneous vertebral artery dissection with vertebral artery hypoplasia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Vessel wall MR imaging in neuroradiology.La Radiologia medica · 2022Review
- Association of dissection features and primary collateral circulation with ischemic stroke in patients with spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection: evaluated using vessel wall-MRI and MRA.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of Cervical Artery Dissection.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Predictors of ischemic events in patients with unilateral extracranial vertebral artery dissection: A single-center exploratory study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Emergent neurovascular imaging in patients with blunt traumatic injuries.Frontiers in radiology · 2022Review
- The Added Value of Vessel Wall MRI in the Detection of Intraluminal Thrombus in Patients Suspected of Craniocervical Artery Dissection.Aging and disease · 2021Article
- Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- The etiologies and prognosis associated with spinal cord infarction.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019Article
- Clinical and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-based prediction of ischemic stroke in cervical artery dissection.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose- Cervical artery dissection is a major cause of ischemic stroke in the young and presents with various imaging findings, including stenosis and intramural hematoma (IMH). Our goal was to determine the relative contribution of lumen findings and IMH to acute ischemic stroke and whether a heavily T1-weighted sequence could more reliably detect IMH. Methods- Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study of 254 patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography for suspected dissection. Imaging included standard turbo spin-echo (TSE) T1-fat saturation and heavily T1-weighted flow-suppressed magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-recalled echo sequences. Subjects with stents (1) or atherosclerotic disease (26) were excluded, leaving 227 subjects. Kappa analysis was used to determine IMH interrater reliability on magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-recalled echo and T1-fat saturation in 4 vessels per subject. Lumen findings, cardiovascular risk factors, medications, and nondissection stroke sources were recorded. Mixed-effects multivariate Poisson regression was used to determine the prevalence ratio of each factor with acute ischemic stroke, accounting for 4 vessels per patient with backward elimination to a threshold P value of 0.10. Results- Patients were 41.9% men, mean age of 47.3±16.6 years, with 114 dissections and 107 strokes. IMH interrater reliability was significantly higher for magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-recalled echo (κ=0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.86) versus T1-fat saturation (0.58; 95% CI, 0.57-0.68). The final acute stroke prediction model included magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-recalled echo-detected IMH (prevalence ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.9; P=0.034), stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, male sex, current smoking, and nondissection stroke sources. The final model had high discrimination for acute stroke (area under the curve, 0.902; 95% CI, 0.872-0.932), compared with models without stenosis (0.861; 95% CI, 0.821-0.902), and without stenosis and IMH (0.831; 95% CI, 0.783-0.879). All 3 models were significantly different at P<0.05. Conclusions- Along with stenosis, IMH detection significantly contributed to acute ischemic stroke pathogenesis in patients with suspected cervical artery dissection. In addition, IMH detection can be made more reliable with heavily T1-weighted sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.