Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30355105›Full record

ArticleStroke2018

Long-Term Consequences of Worsened Poststroke Status in Patients With Premorbid Disability.

Aravind Ganesh, Ramon Luengo-Fernandez, Sarah T Pendlebury, Peter M Rothwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Reperfusion therapies for ischemic stroke in dementia and cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A methodological review of pragmatic designs in acute stroke trials.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Associations between admission levels of multiple biomarkers and subsequent worse outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aravind GaneshFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Stroke Prevention Research Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ramon Luengo-FernandezFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Stroke Prevention Research Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah T PendleburyFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Stroke Prevention Research Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Peter M RothwellFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Stroke Prevention Research Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 104040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Patients with premorbid disability, generally defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥2, are often excluded from trials of acute stroke therapies. However, increased disability in such patients will adversely affect long-term outcomes if treatments are withheld in routine practice. We assessed the extent to which increased disability poststroke influences 5-year mortality, institutionalization, and costs in premorbidly disabled patients. Methods- In a population-based, prospective cohort of patients with ischemic stroke (OXVASC [Oxford Vascular Study], 2002-2014), we tracked mortality, institutionalization, and healthcare/social-care costs during follow-up. We compared 5-year mortality and poststroke institutionalization (Cox regressions) and 5-year healthcare/social-care costs (generalized linear model) in 3-month survivors with premorbid mRS of 2 to 4 (excluding extreme disability, mRS=5), based on the degree of change in mRS(ΔmRS) from prestroke to 3 months poststroke, adjusting analyses for age/sex/initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Results- Among 1607 patients, 530 (33.0%) had premorbid mRS of 2 to 4. Only 2 premorbidly disabled patients received thrombolysis, but 421 (79.4%) were alive at 3 months. ΔmRS was independently associated with 5-year mortality/institutionalization (adjusted hazard ratio for ΔmRS=1 versus 0: 1.59; 95% CI, 1.20-2.11; ΔmRS=2: 2.39; 95% CI, 1.62-3.53; ΔmRS=3: 4.12; 95% CI, 1.98-8.60; P<0.001) and costs (margin for ΔmRS ≥2 versus 0: $30 011, 95% CI, $4222-55 801; P=0.023). Results were similar on examining patients with premorbid mRS of 2, 3, and 4 separately (eg, 5-year mortality/institutionalization adjusted hazard ratio for premorbid mRS=3 with ΔmRS=1 versus 0: 1.60; 95% CI, 1.06-2.42; P=0.027; ΔmRS=2: 3.20; 95% CI, 1.85-5.54; P<0.001). Conclusions- Patients with stroke with premorbid disability have higher mortality, institutionalization, and costs if they accumulate additional disability because of the stroke. These findings highlight the long-term outcomes expected if acute interventions are routinely withheld in patients with mild-moderate premorbid disability and suggest that trials/registries should include such patients.

Indexed as

Thrombolytic TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesRisk FactorsStrokeTime FactorsTreatment Outcomecerebrovascularcohort studiesdisordershumansprognosissurvivors

Identifiers

PMID30355105
PMCPMC6159688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.