Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30354975›Full record

Trial reportStroke2018

Effect of Intrathecal Baclofen on Pain and Quality of Life in Poststroke Spasticity.

Michael Creamer, Geoffrey Cloud, Peter Kossmehl, Michael Yochelson, Gerard E Francisco, Anthony B Ward, Jörg Wissel, Mauro Zampolini, Abdallah Abouihia, Alessandra Calabrese and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01032239 (A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Parallel-group, Multi-center Study to Compare the Effect of Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy Versus Best Medical Treatment on Severe Spasticity in Post-stroke Patients After 6 Months Active Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01032239 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Parallel-group, Multi-center Study to Compare the Effect of Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy Versus Best Medical Treatment on Severe Spasticity in Post-stroke Patients After 6 Months Active Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedtronicNeuroRan2009 to 2016Enrolled61ConditionsSevere SpasticityArmsintrathecal baclofen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Baclofen for alcohol withdrawal.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quality of life measures for people following stroke: a structured content review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Michael CreamerFrom the Central Florida Pain Relief Centers, Orlando (M.C.).
Geoffrey CloudSt. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (G.C.).
Peter KossmehlKliniken Beelitz GmbH Neurologische Rehabilitationsklinik, Beelitz-Heilstätten, Germany (P.K.).
Michael YochelsonMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC (M.Y.).
Gerard E FranciscoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center and TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (G.E.F.).
Anthony B WardNorth Staffordshire Rehabilitation Centre, Haywood Hospital, Stoke-On-Trent, United Kingdom (A.B.W.).
Jörg WisselNeurological Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Department of Neurology, Vivantes Hospital Spandau, Berlin, Germany (J.W.).
Mauro ZampoliniUSL Umbria 2, Department of Rehabilitation, Ospedale di Foligno, Perugia, Italy (M.Z.).
Abdallah AbouihiaNeuromodulation Clinical, Medtronic International, Tolochenaz, Switzerland (A.A., A.C.).
Alessandra CalabreseNeuromodulation Clinical, Medtronic International, Tolochenaz, Switzerland (A.A., A.C.).
Leopold SaltuariAbteilung für Neurologie Landeskrankenhaus Hochzirl, Austria (L.S.).
Medtronic (Switzerland) · CHNeurologisches Fachkrankenhaus für Bewegungsstörungen/Parkinson · DEVivantes Klinikum · DEMemorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation · USAlfred Health · AUBiotronik (Switzerland) · CHCentral Florida Pulmonary Group · USHaywood Community Hospital · GBLandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATShepherd Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) is an effective treatment for managing patients with severe poststroke spasticity, who can experience continued pain and decline in their quality of life (QoL). SISTERS (Spasticity In Stroke-Randomized Study) was a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter, phase 4 study to evaluate ITB therapy versus conventional medical management (CMM) with oral antispastic medications for treatment of poststroke spasticity. Methods- Poststroke patients with spasticity in ≥2 extremities and an Ashworth Scale score of ≥3 in ≥2 affected lower extremity muscle groups were randomized (1:1) to ITB (N=31) or CMM (N=29). Both treatment arms received physiotherapy throughout. The primary outcome was the change in average Ashworth Scale score in the lower extremities of the affected side from baseline to month 6. Here, we report results for secondary outcomes: pain via the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, health-related QoL by the EuroQol-5 dimensional 3 level utility score and health status visual analog scale score, stroke-specific QoL, and patient satisfaction. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results- We observed significant treatment effects in favor of ITB over CMM for changes from baseline to month 6 in Numeric Pain Rating Scale scores for actual pain (ITB versus CMM: mean, -1.17 [SD, 3.17] versus 0.00 [3.29]; median, -1.00 versus 0.00; P=0.0380) and least pain (mean, -1.61 [2.29] versus 0.24 [3.07]; median, -1.00 versus 0.00; P=0.0136), and EuroQol-5 dimensional 3 level utility scores (mean, +0.09 [0.26] versus +0.01 [0.16]; median, +0.07 versus 0.00; P=0.0197). Between-group differences were not statistically significant for EuroQol-5 dimensional 3 level visual analog scale, stroke-specific QoL summary, or Numeric Pain Rating Scale worst pain scores, although ITB patients showed greater numeric improvements from baseline during follow-up. More ITB patients than CMM patients (73% versus 48%) were satisfied with the spasticity reduction at month 6. Conclusions- These data support that ITB therapy is associated with improvements in pain and QoL in poststroke patients. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01032239.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeStroke RehabilitationAdministration, OralAgedBaclofenBenzodiazepinesClonidineDantroleneFemaleHumansInfusions, SpinalMaleMiddle AgedMuscle Relaxants, CentralMuscle SpasticityPainBaclofenBenzodiazepinesClonidineDantroleneMuscle Relaxants, Centraltizanidinebaclofenmuscle spasticitypainquality of lifestroke

Identifiers

PMID30354975
PMCPMC6116794
OpenAlexW2886636502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.