Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30354904›Full record

Trial reportScandinavian journal of primary health care2018

Point-of-care CRP matters: normal CRP levels reduce immediate antibiotic prescribing for acutely ill children in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Marieke B Lemiengre, Jan Y Verbakel, Roos Colman, Kaatje Van Roy, Tine De Burghgraeve, Frank Buntinx, Bert Aertgeerts, Frans De Baets, An De Sutter

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marieke B Lemiengrea Department of Public Health and Primary Care , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Jan Y Verbakelb Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Roos Colmana Department of Public Health and Primary Care , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Kaatje Van Roya Department of Public Health and Primary Care , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Tine De Burghgraevec Department of Public Health and Primary Care , KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
Frank Buntinxc Department of Public Health and Primary Care , KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
Bert Aertgeertsc Department of Public Health and Primary Care , KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
Frans De Baetse Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Infection and Immune Deficiencies , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium.
An De Suttera Department of Public Health and Primary Care , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAntibiotics are prescribed too often in acutely ill children in primary care. We examined whether a Point-of-Care (POC) C-reactive Protein (CRP) test influences the family physicians' (FP) prescribing rate and adherence to the Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) practice guidelines.

designCluster randomized controlled trial.

settingPrimary care, Flanders, Belgium.

interventionHalf of the children with non-severe acute infections (random allocation of practices to perform POC CRP or not) and all children at risk for serious infection were tested with POC CRP. SUBJECTS: Acutely ill children consulting their FP.

main outcome measureImmediate antibiotic prescribing.

results2844 infectious episodes recruited by 133 FPs between 15 February 2013 and 28 February 2014 were analyzed. A mixed logistic regression analysis was performed. Compared to episodes in which CRP was not tested, the mere performing of POC CRP reduced prescribing in case EBM practice guidelines advise to prescribe antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.54 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.33-0.90). Normal CRP levels reduced antibiotic prescribing, regardless of whether the advice was to prescribe (aOR 0.24 (95%CI 0.11-0.50) or to withhold (aOR 0.31 (95%CI 0.17-0.57)). Elevated CRP levels did not increase antibiotic prescribing.

conclusionNormal CRP levels discourage immediate antibiotic prescribing, even when EBM practice guidelines advise differently. Most likely, a normal CRP convinces FPs to withhold antibiotics when guidelines go against their own gut feeling. Future research should focus on whether POC CRP can effectively identify children that benefit from antibiotics more accurately, without increasing the risks of under-prescribing. Key points What is previously known or believed on this topic •Antibiotics are prescribed too often for non-severe conditions. Point-of-care (POC) C-reactive Protein (CRP) testing without guidance does not reduce immediate antibiotic prescribing in acutely ill children in primary care. What this research adds •FPs clearly consider CRP once available: normal CRP levels discourage immediate antibiotic prescribing, even when EBM practice guidelines advise differently. Most likely, a normal CRP convinces FPs to withhold antibiotics when guidelines go against their own gut feeling. •Future research should focus on whether POC CRP can effectively identify children that benefit from antibiotics more accurately, without increasing the risks of under-prescribing.

Indexed as

InfectionsPoint-of-Care SystemsAcute DiseaseAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsBelgiumChildChild, PreschoolC-Reactive ProteinFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive Proteinacute diseaseAnti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic usechildC-reactive protein/analysispoint-of-care-systemsRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30354904
PMCPMC6381547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.