SynthesisHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2018
How Do Home and Clinic Blood Pressure Readings Compare in Pregnancy?
Synthesis in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05485623 (The Use of PulseNmore FC Device in Patients Undergoing IVF Treatment A Study to Evaluate the Safety and the Efficacy), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of PulseNmore FC Device in Patients Undergoing IVF Treatment A Study to Evaluate the Safety and the Efficacy
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of digital health interventions in women with high-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Pooled it
- Low fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes- systematic review of the literature and metanalysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Pooled it
- Self-monitoring of blood pressure among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Feasibility of multi-component intervention for blood pressure control in pregnancy in Nigeria and Ghana: a pilot randomized clinical trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Adherence with blood pressure self-monitoring in women with pregnancy hypertension, and comparisons to clinic readings: A secondary analysis of OPTIMUM-BP.Pregnancy hypertension · 2021Trial
- Perspectives of Ghanaian pregnant women on family involvement in home blood pressure Monitoring: A qualitative analysis.Pregnancy hypertension · 2025Article
- Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring in Pregnancies at Risk of Developing Preeclampsia.Current hypertension reports · 2025Review
- Virtual telehealth visits for prenatal checkups during the COVID- 19 pandemic in Japan: a nationwide survey and feasibility study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Accuracy of the smartphone blood pressure measurement solution OptiBP to track blood pressure changes in pregnant women.Journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- Self-monitoring blood pressure in pregnancy: evaluation of women's experiences of the BUMP trials.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Facilitators and barriers to home blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana: a mixed-methods analysis of patient perspectives.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Using self-monitoring to detect and manage raised blood pressure and pre-eclampsia during pregnancy: the BUMP research programme and its impact.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Review
- Article
- New advances in prediction and surveillance of preeclampsia: role of machine learning approaches and remote monitoring.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Review
- Telehealth in antenatal care: recent insights and advances.BMC medicine · 2023Review
- Ability and accuracy of patient-performed blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in urban Ghana.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Prediction and prevention of preeclampsia in women with preexisting diabetes: the role of home blood pressure, physical activity, and aspirin.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy result in substantial maternal morbidity and are a leading cause of maternal deaths worldwide. Self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) might improve the detection and management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but few data are available, including regarding appropriate thresholds. This systematic review and individual patient data analysis aimed to assess the current evidence on differences between clinic and self-monitored BP through pregnancy. MEDLINE and 10 other electronic databases were searched for articles published up to and including July 2016 using a strategy designed to capture all the literature on self-monitoring of BP during pregnancy. Investigators of included studies were contacted requesting individual patient data: self-monitored and clinic BP and demographic data. Twenty-one studies that utilized self-monitoring of BP during pregnancy were identified. Individual patient data from self-monitored and clinic readings were available from 7 plus 1 unpublished articles (8 studies; n=758) and 2 further studies published summary data. Analysis revealed a mean self-monitoring clinic difference of ≤1.2 mm Hg systolic BP throughout pregnancy although there was significant heterogeneity (difference in means, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.