ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2018
Gender Disparities Among Adult Recipients of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Public.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- The missing sex and gender lens in artificial-intelligence-enabled resuscitation.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- The implementation of diverse skin-toned female manikins in hospital provider basic life support training.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- When Bystanders Skip CPR: Insights from a Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Rethinking CPR training: when the "man" in manikin affects performance, a randomized crossover simulation study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Sex-based differences in clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients treated with mechanical circulatory support.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Barriers to action: behavioral determinants of bystander intervention in medical emergencies - a scoping review.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Sex-based disparities in bystander CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest related to non-prescription drug use.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Differences in bystander CPR by patient, caller, and telecommunicator sex: a retrospective analysis of emergency calls.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Knowledge and attitudes toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation on women in Arab countries: An international cross-sectional survey study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: use of manikin sex, race and body shape - a scoping review.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests treated by an anaesthetist-staffed emergency medical service: a 3-year registry analysis in The Friuli-Venezia-Giulia region.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Relationship Between Bystanders' Willingness to Perform Basic Life Support and Their Personality Traits: A Secondary Analysis of a Nationwide Japanese Survey.Yonago acta medica · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients Receiving Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Influence of the Presence of Other People on Performing Rescue Actions in Emergency Situations - A Questionnaire Survey.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Factors analysis of lower probability of receiving bystander CPR in females: a web-based survey.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Rurality and Area Deprivation and Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Association between bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation and patient's sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Racial and Ethnic and Sex Disparities in the Outcomes and Treatment of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Analysis From the United States.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Development of a health equity tool in resuscitation sciences and application to current research in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2025Review
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) improves survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), yet BCPR rates remain low. It is unknown whether BCPR delivery disparities exist based on victim gender. We measured BCPR rates by gender in private and public environments, hypothesizing that females would be less likely than males to receive BCPR in public settings, with an associated difference in survival to hospital discharge. METHODS AND
resultsWe analyzed data from adult, nontraumatic OHCA events within the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium registry (2011-2015). Using logistic regression, we modeled the likelihood of receiving BCPR by gender, including patient-level variables, stratified by location. A cohort of 19 331 OHCAs was assessed. Mean age was 64±17 years, and 63% (12 225/19 331) were male. Overall, 37% of OHCA victims received bystander CPR. In public locations, 39% (272/694) of females and 45% (1170/2600) of males received BCPR ( P<0.01), whereas in private settings, 35% (2198/6328) of females and 36% (3364/9449) of males received BCPR ( P=NS). Among public OHCAs, males had significantly increased odds of receiving BCPR compared with females (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05-1.53; P=0.01); this was not the case in the private setting (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-1.01; P=NS). Controlling for site, age, and race, BCPR was significantly associated with survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.54-1.85; P<0.01); in this model, males had 29% increased odds of survival compared with females (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.42; P<0.01).
conclusionsMales had an increased likelihood of receiving BCPR compared with females in public. BCPR improved survival to discharge, with greater survival among males compared with females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.