ArticleHuman brain mapping2019
I lie, why don't you: Neural mechanisms of individual differences in self-serving lying.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Take the Rough With the Smooth": Modesty Modulates Neurocognitive and Emotional Processing of Social Feedback.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- EEG-based deception detection using weighted dual perspective visibility graph analysis.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Behavioral dishonesty in multiscenes: Associations with trait honesty and neural patterns during (dis)honesty video-watching.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- The neurosociological paradigm of the metaverse.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Why people engage in corrupt collaboration: an observation at the multi-brain level.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Reputation risk during dishonest social decision-making modulates anterior insular and cingulate cortex activity and connectivity.Communications biology · 2023Article
- The Role of Cognition in Dishonest Behavior.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Self-deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Morality in the flesh: on the link between bodily self-consciousness, moral identity and (dis)honest behaviour.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Detecting spontaneous deception in the brain.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Neural basis of corruption in power-holders.eLife · 2021Article
- Neural mechanisms of deception in a social context: an fMRI replication study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying immoral decisions benefiting self or others.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020Article
- I lie, why don't you: Neural mechanisms of individual differences in self-serving lying.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People tend to lie in varying degrees. To advance our understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms of this heterogeneity, we investigated individual differences in self-serving lying. We performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in 37 participants and introduced a color-reporting game where lying about the color would in general lead to higher monetary payoffs but would also be punished if get caught. At the behavioral level, individuals lied to different extents. Besides, individuals who are more dishonest showed shorter lying response time, whereas no significant correlation was found between truth-telling response time and the degree of dishonesty. At the neural level, the left caudate, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) were key regions reflecting individual differences in making dishonest decisions. The dishonesty associated activity in these regions decreased with increased dishonesty. Subsequent generalized psychophysiological interaction analyses showed that individual differences in self-serving lying were associated with the functional connectivity among the caudate, vmPFC, IFG, and dlPFC. More importantly, regardless of the decision types, the neural patterns of the left caudate and vmPFC during the decision-making phase could be used to predict individual degrees of dishonesty. The present study demonstrated that lying decisions differ substantially from person to person in the functional connectivity and neural activation patterns which can be used to predict individual degrees of dishonesty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.