Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353872›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2018

Distinguishing True Progression From Radionecrosis After Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases With Machine Learning and Radiomics.

Luke Peng, Vishwa Parekh, Peng Huang, Doris D Lin, Khadija Sheikh, Brock Baker, Talia Kirschbaum, Francesca Silvestri, Jessica Son, Adam Robinson and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Text-Driven Tumor Synthesis.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Incidence of radiation necrosis following different radiotherapy fractionation schedules for intracranial meningiomas.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  10. Imaging in Neuro-oncology.Seminars in neurology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Luke PengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Vishwa ParekhThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Peng HuangDepartment of Oncology-Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Doris D LinThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Khadija SheikhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Brock BakerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Talia KirschbaumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Francesca SilvestriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jessica SonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Adam RobinsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Ellen HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Heather AmesDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jimm GrimmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Linda ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Colette ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Michael SoikeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC.
Emory McTyreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC.
Kristin RedmondDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Michael LimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Junghoon LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Michael A JacobsThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Lawrence KleinbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: kleinla@jhmi.edu.

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Elimination of Instrumental Bias for Quantitative Diffusion Imaging in Clinical Oncology TrialsR01CA190299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MALYARENKO, DARIYA I. · 2015 to 2025
$6.4M
Multi-Modality Quantitiative Imaging for Evaluation of Response to Cancer TherapyU01CA140204 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DU, YONG, SOLNES, LILJA · 2011 to 2022
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190299NCI NIH HHS U01 CA140204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment effect or radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is a common phenomenon often indistinguishable from true progression. Radiomics is an emerging field that promises to improve on conventional imaging. In this study, we sought to apply a radiomics-based prediction model to the problem of diagnosing treatment effect after SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included patients in the Johns Hopkins Health System who were treated with SRS for brain metastases who subsequently underwent resection for symptomatic growth. We also included cases of likely treatment effect in which lesions grew but subsequently regressed spontaneously. Lesions were segmented semiautomatically on preoperative T1 postcontrast and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging, and radiomic features were extracted with software developed in-house. Top-performing features on univariate logistic regression were entered into a hybrid feature selection/classification model, IsoSVM, with parameter optimization and further feature selection performed using leave-one-out cross-validation. Final model performance was assessed by 10-fold cross-validation with 100 repeats. All cases were independently reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist for comparison.

resultsWe identified 82 treated lesions across 66 patients, with 77 lesions having pathologic confirmation. There were 51 radiomic features extracted per segmented lesion on each magnetic resonance imaging sequence. An optimized IsoSVM classifier based on top-ranked radiomic features had sensitivity and specificity of 65.38% and 86.67%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.81 on leave-one-out cross-validation. Only 73% of cases were classifiable by the neuroradiologist, with a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 19%.

conclusionsRadiomics holds promise for differentiating between treatment effect and true progression in brain metastases treated with SRS. A predictive model built on radiomic features from an institutional cohort performed well on cross-validation testing. These results warrant further validation in independent datasets. Such work could prove invaluable for guiding management of individual patients and assessing outcomes of novel interventions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID30353872
PMCPMC6746307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.