ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2018
Distinguishing True Progression From Radionecrosis After Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases With Machine Learning and Radiomics.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning driven segmentation and quantification models for brain arteriovenous malformations: A systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2025Pooled it
- The role of artificial intelligence in predicting the clinical outcomes associated with different therapeutic approaches for vestibular schwannoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning imaging applications in the differentiation of true tumour progression from treatment-related effects in brain tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Predicting local control of brain metastases after Gamma Knife radiosurgery: a multimodal deep learning-radiomics approach.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- An Explainable Deep Model for Risk Scoring and Accurate Radionecrosis Identification Following Brain Metastasis Stereotactic Radiosurgery.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Text-Driven Tumor Synthesis.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Radiomics-based Differentiation of Recurrent Brain Metastases from Treatment Effects: A Multi-Institutional Comparative Study with Advanced Imaging.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Imaging Biomarkers in Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Incidence of radiation necrosis following different radiotherapy fractionation schedules for intracranial meningiomas.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Imaging in Neuro-oncology.Seminars in neurology · 2025Review
- AI differentiates radionecrosis from true progression in brain metastasis upon stereotactic radiosurgery: Analysis of 124 histologically assessed lesions.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in cancer: applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brain Gliomas.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Optimizing anisotropic margins in single-isocenter multiple brain metastases radiosurgery using regressor strategies: A multi-institutional validation study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- A Radiogenomic Deep Ensemble Learning Model for Identifying Radionecrosis Following Brain Metastases (BM) Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer BM.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Machine learning unravels the mysteries of glioma typing and treatment.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Bayesian-Optimized Convolutional Neural Networks for Classifying Primary Tumor Origin of Brain Metastases from MRI.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Radiogenomic explainable AI with neural ordinary differential equation for identifying post-SRS brain metastasis radionecrosis.Medical physics · 2025Article
- The clinical implications and interpretability of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in brain tumors.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Gadolinium-Enhanced T2 FLAIR Is an Imaging Biomarker of Radiation Necrosis and Tumor Progression in Patients with Brain Metastases.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTreatment effect or radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is a common phenomenon often indistinguishable from true progression. Radiomics is an emerging field that promises to improve on conventional imaging. In this study, we sought to apply a radiomics-based prediction model to the problem of diagnosing treatment effect after SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included patients in the Johns Hopkins Health System who were treated with SRS for brain metastases who subsequently underwent resection for symptomatic growth. We also included cases of likely treatment effect in which lesions grew but subsequently regressed spontaneously. Lesions were segmented semiautomatically on preoperative T1 postcontrast and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging, and radiomic features were extracted with software developed in-house. Top-performing features on univariate logistic regression were entered into a hybrid feature selection/classification model, IsoSVM, with parameter optimization and further feature selection performed using leave-one-out cross-validation. Final model performance was assessed by 10-fold cross-validation with 100 repeats. All cases were independently reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist for comparison.
resultsWe identified 82 treated lesions across 66 patients, with 77 lesions having pathologic confirmation. There were 51 radiomic features extracted per segmented lesion on each magnetic resonance imaging sequence. An optimized IsoSVM classifier based on top-ranked radiomic features had sensitivity and specificity of 65.38% and 86.67%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.81 on leave-one-out cross-validation. Only 73% of cases were classifiable by the neuroradiologist, with a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 19%.
conclusionsRadiomics holds promise for differentiating between treatment effect and true progression in brain metastases treated with SRS. A predictive model built on radiomic features from an institutional cohort performed well on cross-validation testing. These results warrant further validation in independent datasets. Such work could prove invaluable for guiding management of individual patients and assessing outcomes of novel interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.