ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2019
Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides).
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wild gut microbiome suppresses the potentially opportunistic pathogen Aeromonas in medaka under domesticated rearing conditions.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Composition and Structure of Gut Microbiota of Wild and CaptiveMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- The Microbiome of Catfish (Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Disentangling the gut microbiota of Aldabra giant tortoises of different ages and environments.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Characteristics and differences in immune response capacity and gut microbiome between wild and captive Amur grayling (Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Sex-specific gut microbiome dynamics inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota from Long-term Captive and Newly Captured Whale Sharks (Rhincodon typus).Microbes and environments · 2025Article
- Article
- Metagenomics Analysis Reveals the Composition and Functional Differences of Fecal Microbiota in Wild, Farm, and Released Chinese Three-Keeled Pond Turtles (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Fine-scale geographic difference of the endangered Big-headed Turtle (Platysternon megacephalum) fecal microbiota, and comparison with the syntopic Beale's Eyed Turtle (Sacalia bealei).BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Comparison of the intestinal flora of wild and artificial breeding green turtles (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- The Increasing Role of Short-Term Sperm Storage and Cryopreservation in Conserving Threatened Amphibian Species.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- The impact of culture systems on the gut microbiota and gut metabolome of bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis).Animal microbiome · 2023Article
- Gut microbiota of two invasive fishes respond differently to temperature.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Hatchery tanks induce intense reduction in microbiota diversity associated with gills and guts of two endemic species of the São Francisco River.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Presence of Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Intestinal Tract of the Mediterranean Trout (Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Gut microbiome of endangered Tor putitora (Ham.) as a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes and pathogens associated with fish health.BMC microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Fecal Microbiota of Wild and Captive Beal's Eyed Turtle (Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study was to identify and compare the gut microbial community of wild and captive Tor tambroides through 16S rDNA metagenetic sequencing followed by functions prediction. METHODS AND
resultsThe library of 16S rDNA V3-V4 hypervariable regions of gut microbiota was amplified and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. The sequencing data were analyzed using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt). The most abundant bacterial phyla in both wild and captive T. tambroides were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Cetobacterium spp., Peptostreptococcaceae family, Bacteroides spp., Phosphate solubilizing bacteria PSB-M-3, and Vibrio spp. were five most abundant OTU in wild T. tambroides as compared to Cetobacterium spp., Citrobacter spp., Aeromonadaceae family, Peptostreptococcaceae family and Turicibacter spp. in captive T. tambroides.
conclusionIn this study, the specimens of the wild T. tambroides contain more diverse gut microbiota than of the captive ones. The results suggested that Cetobacterium spp. is one of the core microbiota in guts of T. tambroides. Besides, high abundant Bacteroides spp., Citrobacter spp., Turicibacter spp., and Bacillus spp. may provide important functions in T. tambroides guts. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this study provide significant information of T. tambroides gut microbiota for further understanding of their physiological functions including growth and disease resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.