Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353569›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2018

Effect of an extruded animal protein-free diet on fecal microbiota of dogs with food-responsive enteropathy.

Francesca Bresciani, Yasushi Minamoto, Jan S Suchodolski, Giorgia Galiazzo, Carla G Vecchiato, Carlo Pinna, Giacomo Biagi, Marco Pietra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Correlation betweenAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesca BrescianiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Yasushi MinamotoDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Gastrointestinal Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Texas.
Jan S SuchodolskiDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Gastrointestinal Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Texas.
Giorgia GaliazzoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Carla G VecchiatoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo PinnaDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giacomo BiagiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marco PietraDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-0791
University of Bologna · ITTexas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary interventions are thought to modify gut microbial communities in healthy individuals. In dogs with chronic enteropathies, resolution of dysbiosis, along with remission of clinical signs, is expected with treatment. HYPOTHESIS/

objectiveTo evaluate changes in the fecal microbiota in dogs with food-responsive chronic enteropathy (FRE) and in healthy control (HC) dogs before and after an elimination dietary trial with an animal protein-free diet (APFD). ANIMALS: Dogs with FRE (n = 10) and HC (n = 14).

methodsDogs were fed the APFD for 60 days. Fecal microbiota was analyzed by Illumina 16S rRNA sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

resultsA significantly lower bacterial alpha-diversity was observed in dogs with FRE compared with HC dogs at baseline, and compared with FRE dogs after the trial. Distinct microbial communities were observed in dogs with FRE at baseline compared with HC dogs at baseline and compared with dogs with FRE after the trial. Microbial communities still were different in FRE dogs after the trial compared with HC dogs at baseline. In HC dogs, the fecal microbiota did not show a significant modification after administration of the APFD. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Our results suggest that, in FRE dogs, treatment with the APFD led to a partial recovery of the fecal microbiota by significantly increasing microbiota richness, which was significantly closer to a healthy microbiota after the treatment. In contrast, no changes were detected in the fecal microbiota of HC dogs fed the same APFD.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimalsDiet, Protein-RestrictedDog DiseasesDogsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesMalePolymerase Chain Reactioncanine chronic enteropathiesdysbiosisfood-responsive chronic enteropathymicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID30353569
PMCPMC6271313
OpenAlexW2898203654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.