Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353481›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2018

Chronic comorbidities and cervical cancer screening and adherence among US-born and foreign-born women.

Leslie E Cofie, Jacqueline M Hirth, Rebeca Wong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Personal Networks and Cervical Cancer Screening among Black Immigrant Women.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cervical Cancer Screening Utilization among Kidney Transplant Recipients, 2001 to 2018.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. Assessing Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening with Pap Test by Disability Types.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Acculturation Strategies and Pap Screening Uptake among Sub-Saharan African Immigrants (SAIs).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leslie E CofieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. lecofie@utmb.edu.
Jacqueline M HirthDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Rebeca WongCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX, 77555-0128, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Women's Reproductive Health Fellowship (RHF)T32HD055163 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BERENSON, ABBEY B · 2008 to 2017
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD055163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhereas chronic conditions and foreign-birth have an inverse relationship with cervical cancer screening, the combined effect of these factors on screening is unknown. This study examined the associations between chronic comorbidities and Pap screening recommendations and adherence, and whether these associations vary between foreign- and US-born women.

methodsIn 2017, data from 2013 and 2015 National Health Interview Survey on women aged 21-65 years (N = 20,080) were analyzed. Bivariate associations between chronic comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) and cervical cancer screening recommendation and adherence (screened in the last 3 years) were examined using Chi-square analysis. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to examine the association between foreign-born status and participant Pap test adherence, adjusting for physician Pap test recommendation and chronic comorbidities.

resultsObesity, hypertension, and diabetes were positively associated with Pap screening recommendation. Hypertension and diabetes were negatively associated with screening adherence. Pap screening recommendation (60% vs. 57%, p < 0.05) and adherence (85% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) were higher among foreign-born than US-born women. After adjusting for chronic conditions, foreign-born women had significantly lower odds of receiving Pap tests compared with US-born women (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-0.9). In stratified analysis, only obesity was associated with Pap testing among US-born and foreign-born women. Among foreign-born women, the association between obesity and Pap testing was attenuated after controlling for years lived in the US and citizenship.

conclusionPublic health intervention efforts must improve regular access to preventive care and encourage Pap screening among women diagnosed with chronic conditions. Future research should further identify additional factors driving the cervical cancer screening practices of both US- and foreign-born women with and without chronic conditions.

Indexed as

Papanicolaou TestPatient ComplianceAdultAgedChronic DiseaseComorbidityDiabetes MellitusEarly Detection of CancerEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHumansHypertensionMass ScreeningMiddle AgedObesityPregnancyCervical cancer screeningDiabetesForeign-born womenHypertensionObesity

Identifiers

PMID30353481
PMCPMC11584061
OpenAlexW2897180714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.