ArticleLasers in medical science2019
Impact of different color fiber sleeves on beam hazards of 532-nm laser and vaporization efficiency.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The 532-nm laser has become increasingly popular for the treatment of urologic diseases. However, laser beam will pose significant hazards for the health of surgeons. In order to reduce beam hazards during surgery, we compared the beam hazards of laser fiber with black sleeves to the traditional fiber with transparent sleeves, and the vaporization efficiency. A total of 18 porcine kidney specimens were vaporized in normal saline at a room temperature under 532-nm laser delivered through a 760-μm core diameter side firing fiber. Two groups were divided according to the color of fiber sleeves: the transparent and the black. Each group was then divided into another three subgroups by laser power: the 80 W group, the 120 W group, and the 160 W group. The beam hazard was evaluated by light intensity measured in a sector area at a distance of 0 m, 0.5 m, and 1 m from the irradiation center. The vaporization efficiency was measured by the vaporization groove depth under the working power of 80 W, 120 W, and 160 W with a working distance of 5 mm and irradiation time of 10 s. The light intensity measured in the black fiber sleeve group is significantly lower than that in the transparent one (P < 0.01), regardless of the measuring distance (0 m, 0.5 m, and 1.0 m) and laser power (80 W, 120 W, and 160 W). No statistical difference was found on the vaporization efficiency between the groups protected by fiber sleeves of different colors (transparent/black, p > 0.05). Compared to the traditional transparent fiber sleeves, more beam hazards will be reduced in the operative region with the protection of black fiber sleeves, especially those from the irradiation center. The vaporization efficiency is not affected by the color of fiber sleeves. Such findings may offer a completely new idea for the protection of surgeons in surgeries with 532-nm lasers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.