ArticleInternational journal of hematology2018
Impact of splicing factor mutations on clinical features in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clonal haematopoiesis associates with distinct cytometric changes of red blood cells and platelets.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Deciphering the role of alternative splicing in neoplastic diseases for immune-oncological therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- The impact of erythroblast enucleation efficiency on the severity of anemia in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023Article
- Incidence and prognostic impact of U2AF1 mutations and other gene alterations in myelodysplastic neoplasms with isolated 20q deletion.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- The Biological and Clinical Consequences of RNA Splicing Factor U2AF1 Mutation in Myeloid Malignancies.Cancers · 2022Review
- Bone marrow ring sideroblasts in hematological diseases: an analysis of consecutive 1300 samples in a single institution.International journal of hematology · 2022Article
- Aberrant RNA Splicing Events Driven by Mutations of RNA-Binding Proteins as Indicators for Skin Cutaneous Melanoma Prognosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Splicing factor gene mutations are found in 60-70% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We investigated the effects of splicing factor gene mutations on the diagnosis, patient characteristics, and prognosis of MDS. A total of 106 patients with MDS were included. The percentage of patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts (14.15%) as per the 2017 WHO classification was significantly higher than that of patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (2.88%) as per the 2008 WHO classification (P = 0.005). Splicing factor mutations were detected in 32 patients (13 SF3B1, 8 U2AF1, and 11 SRSF2), and the mutations were mutually exclusive. Significant differences were observed in the mean corpuscular volume, platelet count, bone marrow myeloid:erythroid ratio, and megakaryocyte count in patients with different mutations. SRSF2 mutations were associated with a high cumulative incidence of red blood cell transfusion dependence, while SF3B1 mutations were associated with a low cumulative incidence of platelet concentrate transfusion dependence. Presence of SF3B1 mutation was a significant univariate predictor of overall survival, but become nonsignificant in the multivariate model. Although many factors also could affect survival, these results suggest that splicing factor mutations contribute to distinct MDS phenotypes, including patient characteristics and clinical courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.