Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353229›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Distress and quality of life in patient and caregiver dyads facing stem cell transplant: identifying overlap and unique contributions.

Timothy S Sannes, Teresa L Simoneau, Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson, Crystal L Natvig, Benjamin W Brewer, Kristin Kilbourn, Mark L Laudenslager

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effects of expressive helping writing during stem cell transplant: Randomized controlled trial.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effect of family cohesion on symptom distress during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy S SannesUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Aurora, CO, USA. timothy.sannes@ucdenver.edu.
Teresa L SimoneauVA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Golden, CO, USA.
Susan K Mikulich-GilbertsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Crystal L NatvigDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Benjamin W BrewerUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kristin KilbournDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Mark L LaudenslagerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Research Training in Palliative CareT32AG044296 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI STACY M FISCHER, JEAN S KUTNER · 2014 to 2026
$3.3M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG044296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is a demanding treatment requiring caregiver support. The pre-transplant period is particularly stressful. How patient and caregiver dyads respond to these stressors can impact post-transplant outcomes. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess pre-transplant patient and caregiver distress, patient quality of life (pQoL), and simultaneously investigate relationship between caregiver distress, patient distress, and patient QoL.

methodsWe measured caregiver anxiety, depressive symptoms, perceived stress, sleep quality, caregiver burden, and pQoL in148 dyads compared to clinical thresholds or population norms. To reduce comparisons, we created a composite distress score from affective measures. Associations within dyads were examined via correlation and path analysis.

resultsMost dyads scored above norms for psychological measures. Patient distress was positively associated with caregiver distress. Higher caregiver distress significantly predicted poorer pQoL after accounting for the interdependence of patient and caregiver distress. Specifically, patients' physical functioning was the primary driver of this interrelationship.

conclusionsAllo-HSCT patients and their caregivers reported elevated distress pre-transplant. Both patient and caregiver distress contributed to pQoL, with patients' physical functioning accounting significantly for caregiver well-being. Supporting the patient-caregiver dyad before transplantation is a priority for supportive services.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTransplantation ConditioningYoung AdultCancerCaregiversDyadic relationshipsDyadsHematologyOncology

Identifiers

PMID30353229
PMCPMC6482095
OpenAlexW2898191504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.