Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353209›Full record

ArticleDer Radiologe2018

[Radiologic diagnostics of the gall bladder and bile ducts-part 1 : Imaging techniques-normal variants and congenital disorders-cholelithiasis].

H Helmberger, B Kammer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H HelmbergerZentrum für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin Nymphenburg, Klinikum Dritter Orden, Menzingerstr. 44, 80638, München, Deutschland. h.helmberger@dritter-orden.de.
B KammerKinderradiologie im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital der Radiologischen Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper abdominal pain, icterus and cholestasis are the main symptoms leading to evaluation of the biliary tract. Since the advent of contrast-enhanced ultrasound techniques the accuracy of bile duct imaging has significantly improved. This is also true for computed tomography using isotropic secondary reconstructions as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including MR cholangiography (MRC), classically and after iv injection of hepatobiliary contrast agent. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequences have a recently proven ability for improving biliary tract imaging. These technical improvements provide the depiction of the non-dilated biliary tract system in diagnostic quality. Therefore, normal variants and congenital disorders of biliary tract anatomy are delineated as well as insights into the postoperative situs and complications related to surgery. Cholelithiasis is the most frequent disease of the gall bladder and biliary tract. Together with related complications, in the majority of cases it is also the reason for bile duct inflammation. Due to the immediate need for treatment special care has to be taken for hydrops of the gall bladder.

Indexed as

Biliary TractCholelithiasisBile DuctsCholangiographyGallbladderHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingCholelithiasisGall bladder hydropsMR cholangiography (MRC)Postoperative situsVariants and congenital disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.