Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353179›Full record

ReviewLab animal2018

Honey bees as models for gut microbiota research.

Hao Zheng, Margaret I Steele, Sean P Leonard, Erick V S Motta, Nancy A Moran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Insects · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hao ZhengDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3313-1675
Margaret I SteeleDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Sean P LeonardDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Erick V S MottaDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Nancy A MoranDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. nancy.moran@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

Host and symbiont determinants of colonization by a co-evolved gut communityR01GM108477 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MORAN, NANCY A. · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) offers several advantages as an experimental system for addressing how gut communities affect their hosts and for exploring the processes that determine gut community composition and dynamics. A small number of bacterial species dominate the honey bee gut community. These species are restricted to bee guts and can be grown axenically and genetically manipulated. Large numbers of microbiota-free hosts can be economically reared and then inoculated with single isolates or defined communities to examine colonization patterns and effects on host phenotypes. Honey bees have been studied extensively, due to their importance as agricultural pollinators and as models for sociality. Because of this history of bee research, the physiology, development, and behavior of honey bees is relatively well understood, and established behavioral and phenotypic assays are available. To date, studies on the honey bee gut microbiota show that it affects host nutrition, weight gain, endocrine signaling, immune function, and pathogen resistance, while perturbation of the microbiota can lead to reduced host fitness. As in humans, the microbiota is concentrated in the distal part of the gut, where it contributes to digestion and fermentation of plant cell wall components. Much like the human gut microbiota, many bee gut bacteria are specific to the bee gut and can be directly transmitted between individuals through social interaction. Although simpler than the human gut microbiota, the bee gut community presents opportunities to understand the processes that govern the assembly of specialized gut communities as well as the routes through which gut communities impact host biology.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBeesModels, Animal

Identifiers

PMID30353179
PMCPMC6478020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.