Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353142›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Using insects to detect, monitor and predict the distribution of Xylella fastidiosa: a case study in Corsica.

Astrid Cruaud, Anne-Alicia Gonzalez, Martin Godefroid, Sabine Nidelet, Jean-Claude Streito, Jean-Marc Thuillier, Jean-Pierre Rossi, Sylvain Santoni, Jean-Yves Rasplus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PeerJ · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Update of the Scientific Opinion on the risks to plant health posed byEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Astrid CruaudCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France. astrid.cruaud@inra.fr.
Anne-Alicia GonzalezCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Martin GodefroidCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Sabine NideletCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Claude StreitoCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Marc ThuillierCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Pierre RossiCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Sylvain SantoniINRA, UMR1334 AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Yves RasplusCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRAgropolis International · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sampled ca 2500 specimens of Philaenus spumarius (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) throughout Corsica without a priori knowledge on the presence of symptoms on plants. We screened 448 specimens for the presence of Xylella fastidiosa (Xf) using qPCR and a custom nested PCR. qPCR appeared versatile and under-estimated the prevalence of Xf. Nested PCR showed that Xf was present in all populations. Molecular results were validated by prediction on the distribution of Xf made from tests conducted on plants, which shows the pertinence of using vectors in risk assessment studies. Xf was detected in tenerals and adults. Thus, P. spumarius could acquire Xf from its host plant, mostly Cistus monspeliensis in Corsica, which may act as reservoir for the next season. This contrasts with other observations and suggests that management strategies may have to be adapted on a case-by-case basis. At least two genetic entities and several variants of Xf not yet identified on plants were present in the insects, which suggests ancient introductions of Xf and a probable underestimation of the current diversity of the strains present in Corsica. Interestingly 6% of the specimens carried two subspecies of Xf. Studies are required to better characterize the strains present in Corsica and to determine how the disease was introduced, spread and why no sign of a potential epidemic was detected earlier. This study shows that, when sensitive enough methods are implemented, spittlebugs (and more specifically P. spumarius for which species distribution modelling shows it could be a good sentinel for Europe) can be used to predict and better assess the exact distribution of Xf. Furthermore, Xf multiply only in their foregut and does not become circulative, which facilitates its detection.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsEuropeFranceGeographyHemipteraInsect VectorsPhylogenyXylella

Identifiers

PMID30353142
PMCPMC6199265
OpenAlexW2951755970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.