Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353051›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Identification of Differentially Expressed Non-coding RNA in Porcine Alveolar Macrophages from Tongcheng and Large White Pigs Responded to PRRSV.

Yueran Zhen, Fengqing Wang, Wan Liang, Jianjian Liu, Guoli Gao, Yan Wang, Xuewen Xu, Qiuju Su, Qingde Zhang, Bang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yueran ZhenKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pig Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Fengqing WangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pig Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Wan LiangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pig Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Jianjian LiuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pig Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Guoli GaoKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pig Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Yan WangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pig Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Xuewen XuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pig Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-3346
Qiuju SuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pig Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Qingde ZhangLaboratory Animal Center, College of Animal Science and Technology & Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Bang LiuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Pig Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. liubang@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most ruinous diseases in pig production. Our previous work showed that Tongcheng pigs (TC) were less susceptible to PRRS virus (PRRSV) than Large White (LW) pigs. To elucidate the difference in PRRSV resistance between the two breeds, small RNA-seq and ribo-zero RNA-seq were used to identify differentially expressed non-coding RNAs (including miRNAs and lincRNAs) responded to PRRSV in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) from TC and LW pigs. Totally, 250 known mature miRNAs were detected. For LW pigs, there were 44 down-regulated and 67 up-regulated miRNAs in infection group; while for TC pigs, 12 down-regulated and 23 up-regulated miRNAs in TC infection group were identified. The target genes of the common differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRNAs) in these two breeds were enriched in immune-related processes, including apoptosis process, inflammatory response, T cell receptor signaling pathway and so on. In addition, 5 shared DEmiRNAs (miR-181, miR-1343, miR-296-3p, miR-199a-3p and miR-34c) were predicted to target PRRSV receptors, of which miR-199a-3p was validated to inhibit the expression of CD151. Interestingly, miR-378 and miR-10a-5p, which could inhibit PRRSV replication, displayed higher expression level in TC control group than that in LW control group. Contrarily, miR-145-5p and miR-328, which were specifically down-regulated in LW pigs, could target inhibitory immunoreceptors and may involve in immunosuppression caused by PRRSV. This indicates that DEmiRNAs are involved in the regulation of the immunosuppression and immune escape of the two breeds. Furthermore, we identified 616 lincRNA transcripts, of which 48 and 30 lincRNAs were differentially expressed in LW and TC pigs, respectively. LincRNA TCONS_00125566 may play an important role in the entire regulatory network, and was predicted to regulate the expression of immune-related genes through binding with miR-1343 competitively. In conclusion, this study provides an important resource for further revealing the interaction between host and virus, which will specify a new direction for anti-PRRSV research.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHost-Pathogen InteractionsMacrophages, AlveolarMicroRNAsPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, MessengerSwineMicroRNAsRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID30353051
PMCPMC6199292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.