Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353041›Full record

SynthesisPediatric research2020

Effect of prebiotic and probiotic supplementation on neurodevelopment in preterm very low birth weight infants: findings from a meta-analysis.

Ravi Prakash Upadhyay, Sunita Taneja, Ranadip Chowdhury, Tor A Strand, Nita Bhandari

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. A Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-controlled Trials on the Effects of Probiotics for Autism Spectrum Disorders.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  9. The impact of gut microbiota on morbidities in preterm infants.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. [Expert consensus on enteral nutrition management of preterm infants (2024)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Probiotic Influences on Motor Skills: A Review.Current neuropharmacology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ravi Prakash UpadhyayCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India. ravi.upadhyay@sas.org.in.
Sunita TanejaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Ranadip ChowdhuryCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Tor A StrandDepartment of Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.
Nita BhandariCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Society for Applied Studies · INInnlandet Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are at risk of gut dysbiosis and neurodevelopmental deficits. Prebiotics and probiotics may modulate gut microbiota and influence brain functions. This review synthesizes literature on effect of prebiotic and/or probiotic supplementation in preterm VLBW on their neurodevelopmental outcomes.

methodsSearch was done using PubMed and CENTRAL. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in preterm infants (<37 weeks gestation) and/or infants with birth weight <1500 g that evaluated the effect of prebiotic and/or probiotic supplementation on neurodevelopmental outcomes were included. Weighted mean difference in cognitive and motor scores; pooled relative risks for cognitive and motor impairment, cerebral palsy, hearing, and visual impairment were estimated. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria.

resultsOut of 275 articles identified, seven were included for review. All, except one, were done in preterms <33 weeks of gestation. Age of assessment of outcomes was ≥18-22 months of corrected age in five studies. Interventions did not decrease or increase the risk of cognitive and motor impairment, cerebral palsy, visual, and hearing impairment. Quality of evidence was "low" to "very low."

conclusionsLimited evidence from RCTs does not demonstrate a difference in neurodevelopmental outcomes between prebiotic/probiotic treated and untreated control groups.

Indexed as

PrebioticsBrainCognitionDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightNeurodevelopmental DisordersProbioticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskPrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID30353041
OpenAlexW2897679920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.