Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353019›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

A comprehensive analysis of the faecal microbiome and metabolome of Strongyloides stercoralis infected volunteers from a non-endemic area.

Timothy P Jenkins, Fabio Formenti, Cecilia Castro, Chiara Piubelli, Francesca Perandin, Dora Buonfrate, Domenico Otranto, Julian L Griffin, Lutz Krause, Zeno Bisoffi and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Archives of Razi Institute · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Timothy P JenkinsDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2979-5663
Fabio FormentiCentre for Tropical Diseases, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3203-0872
Cecilia CastroDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Chiara PiubelliCentre for Tropical Diseases, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-3795
Francesca PerandinCentre for Tropical Diseases, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Dora BuonfrateCentre for Tropical Diseases, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Domenico OtrantoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Valenzano, Italy.
Julian L GriffinDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lutz KrauseThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-0845
Zeno BisoffiCentre for Tropical Diseases, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Cinzia CantacessiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. cc779@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-2950
Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITUniversity of Cambridge · GBTranslational Research Institute · AUUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_UP_A090_1006Medical Research Council MR/P011705/1Medical Research Council MR/P01836X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data from recent studies support the hypothesis that infections by human gastrointestinal (GI) helminths impact, directly and/or indirectly, on the composition of the host gut microbial flora. However, to the best of our knowledge, these studies have been conducted in helminth-endemic areas with multi-helminth infections and/or in volunteers with underlying gut disorders. Therefore, in this study, we explore the impact of natural mono-infections by the human parasite Strongyloides stercoralis on the faecal microbiota and metabolic profiles of a cohort of human volunteers from a non-endemic area of northern Italy (S+), pre- and post-anthelmintic treatment, and compare the findings with data obtained from a cohort of uninfected controls from the same geographical area (S-). Analyses of bacterial 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing data revealed increased microbial alpha diversity and decreased beta diversity in the faecal microbial profiles of S+ subjects compared to S-. Furthermore, significant differences in the abundance of several bacterial taxa were observed between samples from S+ and S- subjects, and between S+ samples collected pre- and post-anthelmintic treatment. Faecal metabolite analysis detected marked increases in the abundance of selected amino acids in S+ subjects, and of short chain fatty acids in S- subjects. Overall, our work adds valuable knowledge to current understanding of parasite-microbiota associations and will assist future mechanistic studies aimed to unravel the causality of these relationships.

Indexed as

Healthy VolunteersMetabolomeMicrobiotaAmino AcidsAnimalsAnthelminticsBacteriaBiodiversityFatty AcidsFecesHumansPhylogenyStrongyloides stercoralisStrongyloidiasisAmino AcidsAnthelminticsFatty Acids

Identifiers

PMID30353019
PMCPMC6199319
OpenAlexW2897888228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.