Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30353011›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

A reference haplotype panel for genome-wide imputation of short tandem repeats.

Shubham Saini, Ileena Mitra, Nima Mousavi, Stephanie Feupe Fotsing, Melissa Gymrek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Toward minimal SNP sets for record-matching with CODIS STR profiles.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shubham SainiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1900-0284
Ileena MitraBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-3165
Nima MousaviDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-8982
Stephanie Feupe FotsingBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Melissa GymrekDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. mgymrek@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-3903
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

Expanding the accessible genetic architecture of autism by single molecule sequencingR01MH113715 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SEBAT, JONATHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.1M
Systematic identification and interpretation of repetitive variants underlying schizophreniaDP5OD024577 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GYMREK, MELISSA · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
NIH HHS DP5 OD024577NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short tandem repeats (STRs) are involved in dozens of Mendelian disorders and have been implicated in complex traits. However, genotyping arrays used in genome-wide association studies focus on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and do not readily allow identification of STR associations. We leverage next-generation sequencing (NGS) from 479 families to create a SNP + STR reference haplotype panel. Our panel enables imputing STR genotypes into SNP array data when NGS is not available for directly genotyping STRs. Imputed genotypes achieve mean concordance of 97% with observed genotypes in an external dataset compared to 71% expected under a naive model. Performance varies widely across STRs, with near perfect concordance at bi-allelic STRs vs. 70% at highly polymorphic repeats. Imputation increases power over individual SNPs to detect STR associations with gene expression. Imputing STRs into existing SNP datasets will enable the first large-scale STR association studies across a range of complex traits.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanAllelesGenetic VariationHaplotypesHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID30353011
PMCPMC6199332
OpenAlexW2952679261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.