Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30352792›Full record

SynthesisPediatrics2018

Hospital-to-Home Interventions, Use, and Satisfaction: A Meta-analysis.

Michelle Y Hamline, Rebecca L Speier, Paul Dai Vu, Daniel Tancredi, Alia R Broman, Lisa N Rasmussen, Brian P Tullius, Ulfat Shaikh, Su-Ting T Li

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle Y HamlineDepartment of Pediatrics, mhamline@ucdavis.edu.
Rebecca L SpeierDepartment of Pediatrics.
Paul Dai VuSchool of Aerospace Medicine, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, United States Air Force, Dayton, Ohio.
Daniel TancrediDepartment of Pediatrics.
Alia R BromanDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; and.
Lisa N RasmussenDepartment of Pediatrics.
Brian P TulliusDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Bone Marrow Transplant, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Ulfat ShaikhDepartment of Pediatrics.
Su-Ting T LiDepartment of Pediatrics.
Pediatrics and Genetics · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USOregon Health & Science University · USUnited States Air Force · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextHospital-to-home transitions are critical opportunities to promote patient safety and high-quality care. However, such transitions are often fraught with difficulties associated with increased health care use and poor patient satisfaction.

objectiveIn this review, we determine which pediatric hospital discharge interventions affect subsequent health care use or parental satisfaction compared with usual care. DATA SOURCES: We searched 7 bibliographic databases and 5 pediatric journals. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were: (1) available in English, (2) focused on children <18 years of age, (3) pediatric data reported separately from adult data, (4) not focused on normal newborns or pregnancy, (5) discharge intervention implemented in the inpatient setting, and (6) outcomes of health care use or caregiver satisfaction. Reviews, case studies, and commentaries were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently abstracted data using modified Cochrane data collection forms and assessed quality using modified Downs and Black checklists.

resultsSeventy one articles met inclusion criteria. Although most interventions improved satisfaction, interventions variably reduced use. Interventions focused on follow-up care, discharge planning, teach back-based parental education, and contingency planning were associated with reduced use across patient groups. Bundled care coordination and family engagement interventions were associated with lower use in patients with chronic illnesses and neonates. LIMITATIONS: Variability limited findings and reduced generalizability.

conclusionsIn this review, we highlight the utility of a pediatric discharge bundle in reducing health care use. Coordinating follow-up, discharge planning, teach back-based parental education, and contingency planning are potential foci for future efforts to improve hospital-to-home transitions.

Indexed as

ChildEmergency Service, HospitalHospitals, PediatricHumansInfant, NewbornPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID30352792
PMCPMC6317574
OpenAlexW2896800327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.